Answer:
d
Explanation:
Answer:
1.European governments found ways to pay for expensive wars.
2.There was a shift of military power away from European nations.
3.There was organization of labor on an international basis.
4.European nations could not pay back their foreign loans.
Explanation:Those are the following.
I'm not sure what the answer is.
violation of Free Speech.
The Sedition Act was indeed controversial because it restricted Free Speech during World War I. However, it was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court, who reasoned that restricting speech during wartime is necessary for national security.
The Sedition Act was passed by the United States Congress in 1918 during World War I. This act made it illegal to speak or write anything critical of the government, the military, or the war effort. It was indeed controversial because it was seen as a violation of Free Speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the act was upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court in the case of Schenck v. United States in 1919. The court reasoned that during times of war, the government has the right to restrict speech that presents a clear and present danger to national security.
So, while the Sedition Act did limit Free Speech rights, it was considered acceptable under the circumstances of wartime. It was repealed in 1920 after the end of World War I and is often seen as an example of the tension between national security and civil liberties.
#SPJ6
Answer:
d
Explanation:
ur welcome :))
Answer: D. change historical facts.
Explanation:
You need to provide the full question. Meaning what options are there to answer the question. There are tons of other ways to answer such a question.
Full:
Altering photographs was part of Joseph Stalin’s effort to
promote democracy.
censor the Communist Party.
persecute visual artists.
change historical facts.
Chapter CXLVIII
An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for the President of the United States to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States, west of the river Mississippi, not included in any state or organized territory, and to which the Indian title has been extinguished, as he may judge necessary, to be divided into a suitable number of districts, for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there; and to cause each of said districts to be so described by natural or artificial marks, as to be easily distinguished from every other.
What is one research question that this document could help you answer? Explain how this document could help answer that question.
The question is: under which law, the president of the united states was authorized to distribute the lands to the Indians?
The passage answers this question by quoting the proposed bill that was approved by the then senate to empower the president of the United States to do so.