Answer:
Here's what I get.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Representation of data
I used Excel to create a scatterplot of the data, draw the line of best fit, and print the regression equation.
2. Line of best fit
(a) Variables
I chose arm span as the dependent variable (y-axis) and height as the independent variable (x-axis).
It seems to me that arm span depends on your height rather than the other way around.
(b) Regression equation
The calculation is easy but tedious, so I asked Excel to do it.
For the equation y = ax + b, the formulas are
This gave the regression equation:
y = 1.0595x - 4.1524
(c) Interpretation
The line shows how arm span depends on height.
The slope of the line says that arm span increases about 6 % faster than height.
The y-intercept is -4. If your height is zero, your arm length is -4 in (both are impossible).
(d) Residuals
The residuals appear to be evenly distributed above and below the predicted values.
A graph of all the residuals confirms this observation.
The equation usually predicts arm span to within 4 in.
(e) Predictions
(i) Height of person with 66 in arm span
(ii) Arm span of 74 in tall person
A rectangle is shown. The length of the rectangle is labeled 4 inches. The width of the rectangle is labeled 5 inches.
Show your work to determine the area of the room in square feet.
The area of the given room is 166 2/3 ft².
A scale drawing is a reduced form in terms of dimensions of an original image / building / object. The scale drawing is usually reduced at a constant dimension.
The area of the room can be calculated as;
The length of the room = 20 x 4 = 80 inches
The width of the room = 20 x 5 = 100 inches.
Now, 1 inch = 1/12 foot
80 inches / 12 = 6 2/3 ft
100 / 12 = 8 1/3 ft
The Area = 6 2/3 x 8 1/3
The Area = 25/3 x 20/3
The Area = 500 / 3
The Area = 166 2/3 ft²
Therefore, The area of the given room is 166 2/3 ft².
To learn more about calculate the area of a rectangle, please check: brainly.com/question/16595449
#SPJ2
Answer:
the room will be 80 inches by 100 inches
( 1 inch ----> 20 inches
so 4 inches ----> 80 inches )
or
6 2/3 ft by 8 1/3 ft
Answer:
a) Missing y-values
x = - 2 ==> y = 5
x = - 1 ==> y = 2
x = 1 ==> y = 2
x = 3 ==> y = 10
b) Values of x for y = 4:
x = 1.7 and x = -1.7
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the quadratic function,
y = x² + 1
part a)
to find the y-value for a specific x, just plug in that value of x into the right side and simplify
There are four missing values for
The x values and the corresponding y values are
x = - 2 ==> y = (-2)² + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5
x = - 1 ==> y = (-1)² + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2
x = 1 ==> y = (1)² + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2
x = 3 ==> y = (3)² + 1 = 9 + 1 = 10
part b)
The graph has each unit on the grid for the x-axis = 0.5
and
each unit on the grid for the y-axis = 2
I got this by seeing that between x = 0 and x = 1 there are two units
the value of y at x = -1 or x = 1 is only one vertical unit on the grid and since y = 2 for these values of x, each vertical unit must be 2
Therefore look at the value of y = 4 (which should be two vertical units) on the graph. You can also draw a horizontal line parallel to the x axis at 2 units from the x-axis
It appears that on the positive x-axis for y = 4, x is about halfway between 1.5 and 2 so I would estimate it at 1.75
On the negative x-axis, at y = 4, x is about halfway between -1.5 and -2 so it would be -1.75
One thing to note about quadratic functions is that you get the same value of y for x and -x
So at y = 4, the two possible values of x are
x = 1.75 and x = -1.75
which when using one decimal place will round to 1.7 and 1;75
I am rounding down rather than rounding up since the x value appears be less than 1.75
Mathematically we can solve for x at y = 4 by plugging in values
y = 4 = x² + 1
x² + 1 = 4
x² = 4 - 1 = 3
x =±√3 = ±1.732
which when rounded to 1 decimal place becomes
x = 1.7 and x = -1.7
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) y = (-2)² + 1 = 5
y = (-1)² + 1 = 2
y = (1)² + 1 = 2
y = (3)² + 1 = 10
b) 4 = x² + 1
x² = 4 - 1 = 3
x = ±√3 = ±1.7
b. If the box is to be made out of wood that costs $4 per square foot, which of your designs would be less expensive to produce? Explain.
Answer:
The most cost effective company will be Painting USA that charge $700 to paint Paul house .
Step-by-step explanation:
As given
Paul is going to have the exterior of his home painted.
Painting USA charges $75.00 to come out and evaluate the house plus $25.00 per hour of labor.
If it takes 25 hours to paint Paul’s house.
Total amount charge by Painting USA = Painting USA charges for come out and evaluate the house + Cost of per hour of labor × Total hours take to paint Paul house .
Total amount charge by Painting USA = 75 + 25 × 25
= 75 + 625
= $ 700
As given
Upscale Home Painting does not charge to evaluate the house. However, they charge $40.00 per hour.
Total amount charge by Upscale Home Painting = Cost of per hour of labor × Total hours take to paint Paul house
= 40 × 25
= $ 1000
Therefore the most cost effective company will be Painting USA that charge $700 to paint Paul house .