Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
4x² = 64 ( divide both sides by 4 )
x² = 16 ( take the square root of both sides )
x = ± = ± 4
Solutions are x = - 4 and x = 4 → C
a. Her uncle leaves her 20 thousand pounds
c. She write a book that is published
b. Parent's from the school reward her for her work
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
I JUST TOOK THE TEST THE ANSER IS D.
Alternate interior angles theorem
Step-by-step explanation:
ADEG and AEFG are right triangles.
The figure shows DE = EF, AND
EG EG by the Reflexive Property.
Therefore, by the HL theorem,
ADEG AEFG
G
X Х
Choose the correct answer below.
O A. The two triangles are congruent by SAS, not the HL Theorem.
O B. In AEFG, EF is a leg and in ADEG, DE is the hypotenuse, so they cannot be corresponding sides.
O C. The two triangles are congruent by SSS, not the HL Theorem.
OD. In AEFG, EG is a leg, and in ADEG, EG is the hypotenuse, so they cannot be corresponding sides.
The two triangles are congruent by SAS, not the HL theorem. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
Triangle DEG and triangle EFG are right triangles.
The figure shows DE=EF (Given)
EG=EG by the reflexive property.
Therefore, by the HL theorem, Triangle DEG and triangle EFG are congruent.
Here, Mohamed stated postulate wrong.
By SAS postulate, Triangle DEG and triangle EFG are congruent.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
To learn more about the congruent theorem visit:
brainly.com/question/24033497.
#SPJ6
Answer:B?
Step-by-step explanation:
In the sample, 72 said "yes."
(a) do the data give good evidence that more than two-thirds (67%) of authors support continuing this system? carry out an appropriate test to help answer this question.
(b) interpret the p-values from your test in the context of the problem.
Answer:
There is no significant evidence that more than two-thirds (67%) of authors support continuing this system.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p be the proportion of authors who support continuing the system
Then hypotheses are:
: p=0.67
: p>0.67
To calculate the test statistic:
z= where
Then z= ≈ 0.477
p-value of test statistic is ≈0.317
Assuming a significance level 0.05, since 0.317>0.05 we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
p-value 0.317 is the probability that the sample is drawn from the distribution assumed under null hypothesis, that is where the proportion of authors supporting the new publishing system is at most 0.67
A hypothesis test for a proportion is used to determine whether more than two-thirds of authors support continuing the system. The p-value associated with the test is less than 0.0001, indicating that the data provide good evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the majority of authors support continuing the system.
To determine whether the data provides evidence that more than two-thirds (67%) of authors support continuing the system, we can use a hypothesis test for a proportion. We will use a significance level of 0.05.
Let's set up our hypotheses:
Using the normal approximation to the binomial, we can calculate the test statistic and p-value. With a sample size of 104 and 72 authors in favor, the test statistic is:
z = (72 - 0.67 * 104) / sqrt(0.67 * (1 - 0.67) * 104) ≈ 3.79
The p-value associated with a z-score of 3.79 is less than 0.0001. Since this p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, the data provide good evidence that more than two-thirds of authors support continuing the system.
#SPJ6