Answer:
Option (A)
Step-by-step explanation:
For equation of the line,
Let the equation is, y = mx + b
Slope 'm' of the line passing through two points (-3, 4) and (2, -1),
m =
=
= -1
y-intercept of this line, b = 1
Now we substitute these values in the equation,
y = -x + 1
Let the equation of the parabola is,
y = a(x - h)² + k
Here, (h, k) is the vertex of the parabola,
Since vertex of the given parabola is (0, -5),
then the equation will be,
y = a(x - 0)²- 5
y = ax² - 5
Since a point (2, -1) lies on this parabola,
-1 = a(2)² - 5
5 - 1 = 4a
a = 1
Equation of the parabola will be,
y = x² - 5
Therefore, Option (A) will be the answer.
1)70
2)140
3)40
4)280
The total distance that was run by Runners who each ran for 1/3 of a mile will be 4/3.
The distance is defined as the length of the space between the two points separated from each other.
From the graph, the distance of 1/3 miles is covered by 4 runners so the total distance will be calculated as:-
Distance = 1/3 x 4
Distance = 4/3 miles
Hence the total distance that was run by Runners who each ran for 1/3 of a mile will be 4/3.
To know more about distance follow
#SPJ2
So you would do 1/3 times 4 so that is 1 and 1/3
Sample Mean 25 23
Sample Variance 27 7.56
Sample Size 45 36
As the statistical advisor to Ajax, would you recommend purchasing Allied's machine? Explain.
Answer:
z(s) is in the acceptance region. We accept H₀ we did not find a significantly difference in the performance of the two machines therefore we suggest not to buy a new machine
Step-by-step explanation:
We must evaluate the differences of the means of the two machines, to do so, we will assume a CI of 95%, and as the interest is to find out if the new machine has better performance ( machine has a bigger efficiency or the new machine produces more units per unit of time than the old one) the test will be a one tail-test (to the left).
New machine
Sample mean x₁ = 25
Sample variance s₁ = 27
Sample size n₁ = 45
Old machine
Sample mean x₂ = 23
Sample variance s₂ = 7,56
Sample size n₂ = 36
Test Hypothesis:
Null hypothesis H₀ x₂ - x₁ = d = 0
Alternative hypothesis Hₐ x₂ - x₁ < 0
CI = 90 % ⇒ α = 10 % α = 0,1 z(c) = - 1,28
To calculate z(s)
z(s) = ( x₂ - x₁ ) / √s₁² / n₁ + s₂² / n₂
s₁ = 27 ⇒ s₁² = 729
n₁ = 45 ⇒ s₁² / n₁ = 16,2
s₂ = 7,56 ⇒ s₂² = 57,15
n₂ = 36 ⇒ s₂² / n₂ = 1,5876
√s₁² / n₁ + s₂² / n₂ = √ 16,2 + 1.5876 = 4,2175
z(s) = (23 - 25 )/4,2175
z(s) = - 0,4742
Comparing z(s) and z(c)
|z(s)| < | z(c)|
z(s) is in the acceptance region. We accept H₀ we did not find a significantly difference in the performance of the two machines therefore we suggest not to buy a new machine
The very hight dispersion of values s₁ = 27 is evidence of frecuent values quite far from the mean
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Applying the Laplace transform:
With the formulas:
Solving for
Apply the inverse Laplace transform with this formula:
The measure of side SQ from the given similar triangles is 40.9 units.
Two triangles are similar if the angles are the same size or the corresponding sides are in the same ratio. Either of these conditions will prove two triangles are similar.
Given that, triangle NOP is similar to triangle QRS.
Since the triangles are similar,
NP/SQ = NQ/QR
10/SQ = 13/53.2
13SQ=532
SQ=532/13
SQ=40.9 units
Therefore, the measure of side SQ is 40.9 units.
To learn more about the similar triangles visit:
brainly.com/question/25882965.
#SPJ2
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
........
Answer:
14h+15
Step-by-step explanation:
(7h + 7) + (7h + 8)
First simplify
Eliminate redundant parentheses
(7h+7)
7h+7+7h+8
Add the numbers
7h+(7)+7h+(8) . 7+8=15
7h+15+7h
Combine like terms
(7h)+15+(7h) (7h)+(7h)=14h
14h+15
The answer would be 14h+15