Answer:
At the end of the Han Dynasty, the dynasty fell into chaos and corruption within the eunuchs empress' clan, and
Explanation:
At the end of the Han Dynasty, the dynasty fell into chaos and corruption within the eunuchs empress' clan, and Confucian scholar officials caused for the dynasty to slowly fall apart; power and control was lost. During this, the peasant class was effected by the ideas and ideals of Daoism. hope this helps you :)
The Han Dynasty collapsed due to factors like civil war, peasant rebellions, neglected farmland, and foreign invasions. However, a decline in trade was not a direct cause for the fall of the dynasty.
The fall of the Han Dynasty in ancient China was due to a number of factors such as civil war, peasant rebellions, neglected farmland, and foreign invasions. However, a decline in trade was not a direct reason for the fall of the dynasty. Unusually cold weather, natural disasters, and resource scarcity were additional factors causing hardships, along with mismanagement by the imperial government. However, these factors, while contributing to the socio-economic instability, did not directly cause the decline in trade.
#SPJ2
c. turn India into an industrial nation.
b. bring Muslims and Hindus together in India.
d. enable India to feed all of its people.
Correct answer:
Historical background/details:
In the decades after the Civil War, states in the South began to pass laws that sought to keep white and black society separate. In the 1880s, a number of state legislatures began to pass laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for passengers who were black. At the heart of the case that became Plessy v. Ferguson was an 1890 law passed in Louisiana in 1890 that required railroads to provide "separate railway carriages for the white and colored races.”
In 1892, Homer Plessy, who was 1/8 black, bought a first class train railroad ticket, took a seat in the whites only section, and then informed the conductor that he was part black. He was removed from the train and jailed. He argued for his civil rights before Judge John Howard Ferguson and was found guilty. His case went all the way to the Supreme Court which at that time upheld the idea of "separate but equal" facilities.
Several decades later, the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision was overturned. Brown v. Board of Education, decided by the US Supreme Court in 1954, extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to education. The "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. Ferguson had been applied to education as it had been to transportation. In Topeka, Kansas, Oliver Brown filed a lawsuit after the public school district refused to enroll his daughter in the school closest to their home, making her instead take a bus to a blacks-only school. Other families joined the Brown family lawsuit. When it went to the level of the Supreme Court, there were other cases from other parts of the country that the Supreme Court combined with it. The full name of the case at the Supreme Court level was Oliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al. The arguments were heard before the Supreme Court in 1952 and 1953, and the Brown v. Board of Education decision was issued in 1954. The standard of "separate but equal" was challenged and defeated. Segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional.
The 14th Amendment was being violated by states whose laws supported the segregation of schools. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment reads as follows:
Answer:
In 1970, President Nixon tried to break the stalemate in the peace process by (1 point) pulling U.S. forces out of Cambodia. ... ordering a ground attack on Vietcong bases in Cambodia. sending economic aid to the Cambodian government.
Explanation:
A.your chosen profession.
B.your deeds in a previous life.
C.a test you take when you are 15.
D.the caste system of your husband or wife.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Answer:
A test when you are 15 and the caste system of your husband or wife. P.S. I may be right i don't get me wrong okay i'm only here to help
Explanation:
I say that because hey it make sense now think about the question and answer it okay reread it over and over to get it okay?
Answer:
The Iroquois
Explanation:
During the first half of the 17th Century Dutch have established alliances with Iroquois. They even supported them with providing the weapons, while Iroquois participated in some conflicts on the side of Dutch. Still, in the second half of that Century Dutch Republic was unable to spread its influence furthermore.
Answer:
B.The Iroquois is the correct answer.
Explanation:
During colonisation of America French, Spanish and dutch viewed the natives differently and forged different relationships with them.The dutch did not emphasised on the religious conversion of native Americans but focused on the trade with the native Americans present in New York and New Jersey region. and formed a fur trade alliance with Iroquois Confederacy which was the powerful Native American empire in 17th century. The population of confederacy was drastically reduced due to smallpox and other diseases brought by Europeans. Despite the fall in population the confederation was strong and formed alliance with the Dutch. In return they got Dutch weapons, it helped them to defeat the Hurons.