How did Jan Matzeliger change the shoemaking industry in the 1800s?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Adding laces to shoes was laborious, so Matzeliger invented the lacing machine. C. Adding heels to shoes was laborious, so Matzeliger invented the heeling machine. ... Attaching the top of the shoe to the sole was laborious, so Matzeliger invented the lasting machine

Related Questions

Why was Galileo accused of and convicted of heresy by the Church?
Mehta is the main reason voters choose political candidates
Why did Americans start hunting wolves? A)they were afraid of wolves.B)they needed wolf meat for food.C) they thought wolves were eating too many elk. D) they found the wolves howling annoying .
How did the trans-Atlantic slave trade change the African economy?
How did the Song Dynasty's imperial bureaucracy represent a political contintiuty(How was it the same before)​

What could julius caesar have done to show his enemies he wasn't abusing his power

Answers

There were numerous things. For starters, he could've resigned and showed that he doesn't plan to become a dictator. In addition, Romans were all about outward appearance and social status and much of Caesar's behavior towards the high ranking senate members was humiliating to them so they naturally loathed him. He could've given them more respect in order to gain their support.

Which group was brought to the colonies using force ?

Answers

Answer:

African Slaves

Explanation:

They were transported in cargo ships where they were packed close together in what is now known as the Middle Passage, one of the three components that made up the Atlantic triangular trade pattern.

Who created this work of artVincent Van Gogh
Pierre-Auguste Renoir
Wassily Kandinsky
Pablo Picasso

Answers

Answer:

Pablo Picasso

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it's Pablo picasso

Explain one similarity in the role of serfs and vassals in the feudal system between 600 and 1450?

Answers

Answer:

One similarity is that they both owed service to another person of high status. Serfs owed service to lords because they provided them protection and land. Vassals owed service to kings because they provided them land.

Explanation:

In korematsu vs united States the federal exclusion order forced japanese Americans into relocation camps was deemed constitutional because it was issued under

Answers

The correct answer is:  because it was issued under special circumstances during wartime.

Korematsu v. United States  ( 1944 ) was a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the execution of Executive Order 9066. This order ordered Japanese Americans into interment camps due to suspicions of espionage and their engagement against the United States.

The Court ruled that the need to protect the country against espionage outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese descent, such as Fred Korematsu.

According to the Justices, Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of his race but because the United States was at was with the Japanese Empire and the order was a way to protect America.

wartime conditions is your answer my good sir 

Read the following excerpt from a presidential proclamation issued in 1865 and answer the question below.I, Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, . . . hereby grant and assure to all white persons who have, directly or indirectly, participated in the existing rebellion, except as hereinafter excepted, a full pardon, but upon the condition, nevertheless, that every such person will . . . take and subscribe the following oath . . .

Source: Library of Congress

Why did Radical Republicans disagree with this proclamation?

Answers

Answer:

Radical Republicans disagreed with this Presidential Proclamation because they thought that President Johnson is being too merciful towards the Southerners.

Explanation:

On May 29, 1865, President Andrew Johnson declared a Presidential Proclamation under which, with the purpose not to punish Southerners and quickly reunite the States, he granted political rights to those who swore their faithfulness towards the States.

In the viewpoint of Radical Republicans, this Presidential Proclamation was indulgent towards the Southerners who started the war. According to these Radical Republicans, these Southerners needed to be punished harshly.

Therefore, the reason why Radical Republicans disagreed with this proclamation was because they considered that President Johnson was being too merciful towards the Southerners.

The Radical Republicans disagreed with this proclamation because they believed it was too lenient towards the former Confederates and did not address the issues of civil rights for freed slaves and land redistribution. They also had concerns about President Johnson's commitment to enforcing the conditions of the proclamation.

The Radical Republicans disagreed with this proclamation because they believed that it was too lenient towards the former Confederate states and did not do enough to punish the individuals responsible for the rebellion. They wanted more stringent conditions for receiving pardon, including the protection of civil rights for freed slaves and the redistribution of land to them.

The proclamation also clashed with the Radical Republicans' vision of Reconstruction, which involved a more radical and transformative process of rebuilding the South. They believed that the proclamation undermined their goals and would impede progress towards equal rights and opportunities for all citizens.

The Radical Republicans also had concerns about President Johnson's intentions and his willingness to ensure the proper execution of the proclamation. They feared that he would not enforce the conditions or take action against those who violated them, which would effectively undermine the punishment and accountability they sought.

Learn more about Radical Republicans and the presidential proclamation of 1865 here:

brainly.com/question/33726988

#SPJ3