Who founded the Safavid empire at the age of 14 years old

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Shah Ismail I

Explanation:

He was 14 when this empire was founded and died at age 36, in 1524


Related Questions

How did Constantinople respond to numerous invasion attempts before 1453?
Francis Drake was the first Frenchman to sail around the world.True or False English pirates looted Portuguese vessels in the New World. True or False
What was the main point of the Fifteenth Amendment?giving the right to vote to all American malesgiving citizenship to the slavesthe abolition of slaverymaking it illegal to discriminate against a person because of their race
Christians adapted the Roman basilica and used it for public worship. Where in their churches did they place the altar? at the apse at the atrium at the nave at the narthex
What is the impact of the Treaty of Versailles and its outcomes? Please give some examples.

The president must consider the possibility of developing the atomic bomb. I believe it will be done and I think we must do it before the Germans do.A.Billy Mitchell

B.Franklin Roosevelt

C.Albert Einstein

D.a pacifist

Answers

"The president must consider the possibility of developing the atomic bomb. I believe it will be done and I think we must do it before the Germans do." The answer is option C. Albert Einstein. Einstein wrote a letter to President F.D. Roosevelt telling him that there was work going on that turned uranium into a source of energy, and extremely powerful bombs could thus be created. Then he wrote that steps had to be taken to accelerate uranium research before Germany could build this new powerful bomb.

it is C: Albert Einstien

Why did the stock market crash in 1929

Answers

Answer: Investors bought stocks on credit because they thought prices would continue rising.

Explanation:

There was much speculative buying on the stock market in "the Roaring '20s," as the decade was known.  In the 1920s, people were so eager to invest and earn profits through the stock market that they bought stocks "on margin."  In other words, they paid for only a marginal percentage of the stocks with their own funds, and borrowed bank funds for the rest of the purchase.  By the late 1920s, 90% of the purchase price of stocks was being made with borrowed money.  This inflated the market in a way that spiraled out of control, and in 1929 the market crashed.

The stock market crashed in 1929 because investors had put too much capital into the stocks by borrowing large amounts of money that they did not truly have.

Imagine you are a farmer in Venezuela. How might you have felt about the changes Chávez brought about?

Answers

The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.  

If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.

If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.  


Answer:

Like many farmers and laborers, I likely would support the changes that Chávez brought about because they helped Venezuela’s poor. As president, Chávez introduced education, healthcare, and labor initiatives to improve the quality of life for the lower classes of Venezuela.

Explanation:a

What is the significance of the Hundred Days?

Answers

Answer:

Roosevelt coined the term "first 100 days" during a July 24, 1933, radio address. 13 major laws were enacted during this period. Since then, the first 100 days of a presidential term has taken on symbolic significance, and the period is considered a benchmark to measure the early success of a president.

Griswold vs Connecticut on what did justice Goldberg base his concurring opiniona. The protection granted by the constitutionb. The intention of the writers of the Constitutionc. C list of Rights in the first eight amendmentsd. The Human Rights safe from government intervention

Answers

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Justice Goldber based his concurring opinion in the protection granted by the Constitution to the rights of people.

Explanation:

Griswold v. Connecticut was a major court decision in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution protects the right to privacy. The ruling concerned a state law in Connecticut called Comstock Law that prohibited anyone from using "drugs, medical items or instruments to prevent conception". By a vote of seven votes to two, the Supreme Court invalidated this law by considering that it violated the right to marital intimacy.

In 1961, Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton opened a family planning center that welcomed many young women. They were sued by the state of Connecticut for violating the Comstock Law, which prohibited the delivery of any substance or material that may prevent fertilization. They were fined $ 100 each. Estelle Griswold appealed the decision of the Connecticut court to the Supreme Court, which in 1965 rendered a judgment in its favor, explaining that the Comstock Law violated the 5th, 9th and 14th amendments.

Justice Arthur Goldbert wielded a concurrent opinion based on the 9th Amendment and the protection it gives to the right to privacy.

On the Griswold vs Connecticut case, justice Goldberg based his concurring opinion on the protection granted by the constitution because a cornstack law prohibited any use of medicinal article or instrument that prevented conception in Connecticut in 1965.

During the Civil War, the North effectively used the strategy of "total war" to weaken the South. a. True
b. False

Answers

The correct answer is true.

It is true that during the Civil War, the North effectively used the strategy of total war to weaken the South.  

Total war means the usage of any kind of weapons, the territory, the combat and the soldiers. The Union used total war strategy to win the war at all cost. The Union considered military targets civilian and basic infrastructure in the South. That is why it was lethal. The total war strategy of the Union caused the Southern economy to suffer.