Answer:
Explanation:
We use them to give detail to the noun that we are describing. For example: she was a woman. ( this is kinda obvious because it starts with she, but we need more details so we would say. ) she was a young woman. this will help us describe her better in details when telling a story.
Hope that helps
A.
false analogy
B.
red herring
C.
bandwagon
D.
fallacy of argument from ignorance
The type of special appeal the argument demonstrates is a): false analogy.
A false analogy is an informal fallacy, it applies to inductive arguments, like the one in this excerpt. It is an informal fallacy because the error is about what the argument is about, and not the argument itself.
The argument given by the opponent is a valid argument, but it is wrong in the context since the debate is focused specifically on the topic of whether new laws are needed to prevent distracted driving, not on every action that causes driving accidents. It would be valid in other debate, but not in this one, although the subject "driving accidents" is common on both.
Answer:
1. Selection
2. Organization
3. Interpretation-Evaluation
( 2) Jamie doesn't understand why Sarah has refused.
(1) Sarah declines Jamie's invitation to go to the mall.
(3) Jamie concludes that Sarah is mad at her.
Explanation:
Which of these is an accurate and appropriate summary of this paragraph?
A)
The speaker talks to her sister who understands politics.
B)
The speaker talks to her sister about all of her problems.
C)
The speaker wants her sister to tell her which party is best.
D)
The speaker is trying to find out who her sister is voting for.
The speaker talks to her sister who understandspolitics