Answer:
C
Explanation:
They asked politely as to not anger the king but to change his way of governing them and stay together as allies
Answer:
A
Explanation:
In the early days of America, when it was just beginning to be colonized and explored, many of the colonies relied relatively heavily on the British empire to provide them with certain goods. These often came with a hefty price tag in the form of taxes, especially after a war that had left Britain deep in debt. However, the United States was still a much smaller and less powerful country than Britain, and any attempts to fight would likely result in a worse situation for all Americans. Therefore, the best answer here would be choice A. Hope this helps!
b. Wilson opposed the League and it never made it to a Senate vote.
c. The Senate liked it but Wilson opposed it.
d. The United States was not invited to join.
The correct answer is:
A. Wilson liked it, but it never passed in the Senate.
Explanation:
President Woodrow Wilson supported the idea of a League of Nations to settle future conflicts between countries; he even included it in the 14 Points he made to prevent another world war. Wilson attended meetings and negotiations and asked American citizens to support it but the United States' Senate opposed to League and failed to ratify the treaty because it feared that the U.S could lose sovereignty.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement protects you from arbitrary and invasive searches by law enforcement. Authorities must have a warrant, based on probable cause, to conduct a search or seizure. This safeguard balances the government's need to investigate crime with citizens' rights to privacy.
The Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement protects individuals by requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant from a judge before conducting a search or seizure. This warrant must be based on probable cause, i.e., a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed and that the place to be searched or items to be seized will provide evidence of this crime. Furthermore, the warrant must detail the specific location to be searched, and the persons or items to be seized, ensuring protection from arbitrary and invasive searches.
This amendment largely serves to balance the government's need to investigate crime with citizens' rights to personal privacy. For instance, if the police want to search your home, they must first convince a judge there's a good chance they could find evidence of a crime there. If a judge is unconvinced, the search would not be allowed. Hence, the warrant requirement act as a safeguard against unreasonable intrusions into personal privacy.
#SPJ12
Answer:
Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that both Founding Fathers had different views regarding economy and political organization of the government.
Explanation:
Hamilton, although of humble origin, developed an urban and sophisticated worldview, and was appointed Secretary of the Treasury by George Washington, of whom he was an assistant during the War of Independence, and who had him as the most outstanding intellectual of his cabinet. Hamilton defended the need for a strong central government that would stimulate commerce and industry. He set up a federal central bank to spread credit, given that the Constitution did not prohibit it, and proposed protectionist tariffs to develop the national productive apparatus by making foreign imports more expensive.
Jefferson, on the other hand, distrusted a strong central government, while postulating the idea of a virtuous republic, subject to the control of society and supported by small farmers. He thought it was better to distribute power among states and local entities to protect individual rights from the risk of tyranny, his greatest terror. Apart from its explicit rejection of indebtedness that future generations would have to pay by means of taxes, his argument against the great federal bank dismantled and reversed Hamilton's reasoning: as the 1787 Constitution did not expressly authorize the creation of that credit institution, the government should not found it. For Jefferson, the limits of legality were very clear: the government could only do what the law ordered; society, on the other hand, could do everything that the law did not prohibit.