Answer:
The correct answer is the third option: A global strategy would be appropiate since most mobile phones are constructed to work globally and buyer needs across the world are relatively universal.
Explanation:
To begin with, in order to understand that using a global strategy is better and more suitable for the company first we need to understand that the company is working in the industry of mobile phones and therefore that is makes great sense to employ a global strategy that is focus on launching the products to the whole world or at least to the greater amount of countries that the company can because when it comes to mobile phones the needs of the consumers in every part tend to be the same and therefore it would no need much customization and the company will be able to release their product globally.
A mobile phone company should employ a transnational strategy because it allows for the application of the same strategic theme while permitting necessary country-specific customization to meet diverse consumer preferences, balancing standardization benefits with local adaptation needs.
If a company's product is mobile phones, it would likely make better strategic sense to employ a transnational strategy. This strategy is appropriate because it allows the company to apply the same strategic theme across different markets while still acknowledging the need for country-specific customization. Conforming to different consumer preferences in mobile phone features across countries is essential, given that tastes and functional requirements may vary significantly. For instance, a mobile phone that is successful in one country may require modifications to suit the network availability, cultural preferences, or legal requirements in another country.
On the other hand, a global strategy assumes a universal demand across all markets, which is not typically the case for mobile phones due to varied consumer needs and standards. Lastly, a multidomestic strategy may result in excessive fragmentation of the product line, undermining the advantages of economies of scale, which multinational companies (MNCs) like mobile phone manufacturers seek to exploit. Therefore, a transnational strategy strikes a balance between standardization and customization, ideal for competing in the international mobile phone market.
Answer with Explanation:
A "graduated lease" is a type of lease that is long-term in nature. Here, the lessor/landlord enters into an agreement with the lessee/tenant/occupant that the property that the tenant will be renting is subject to an increase or decrease in the rental fee depending on its market value as the years pass by. So, this means that the rental fee is not stable or fixed, rather it changes with times.
This lease is also called a "graded lease." An increase in rental fee is common for real estates that are being rented while a decrease in rental fee is common for equipment or machinery that are being rented.
Answer:
10 fewer tons of pollution into the river and Firm B will dump 50 fewer tons of pollution into the river.
Explanation:
Firm B will SELL ALL of its allotted 20 permits, and clean up all of its 50 units of pollution. The price per permit will be above $50 each. Firm A will BUY ALL 20 of B's permits. It will then dump 40 tons into the water, and will clean up its remaining 10. The price it pays for a permit will be under $100.
Answer:
Firm B will sell all its permits to Firm A i.e ( lesser chemical dumps into the river )
Explanation:
Firm B will rather sell all its 20 tonnes worth of pollution permit to firm A because it would cause Firm B lesser than Firm A when they dispose off their wastes before it gets to the River hence they will rather dispose off their waste rather than paying/purchasing pollution permits while
Firm A will buy out all of Firm B's allotted pollution permits to reduce the number of tonnes they would dispose off before getting to the river. this is because it would cause them more when they dispose off their waste before getting it to the river. hence the End product of the whole arrangement will be Chemical dumps into the River will be reduced drastically to 40 overall instead of 100 due to the cost of dumping permits.
Answer:
Net income year 2 = $21,300
Explanation:
I looked for the missing information and found this:
Year Depreciation overstated Prepaid expense omitted
1 $2,500 $2,000
2 $4,000 $2,700
If your question doesn't include the same values, just adjust the answer.
Year 2's net income = net income (year 2) + overstated depreciation (year 2) + omitted prepaid expenses (year 1) - omitted prepaid expenses (year 2) = $18,000 + $4,000 + $2,000 - $2,700 = $21,300
Answer:
EOQ = 220.6052281 shirts rounded off to 221 shirts
The order should be placed after every 110 days.
Explanation:
The EOQ or economic order quantity is the optimum order level or quantity which minimizes the inventory related costs. This is the order quantity where the cost of ordering and the cost of holding the inventory is the minimum. The formula for EOQ is,
EOQ = √(2 * AD * O) / H
Where,
Annual demand for t shirts (assuming 365 days per year) = 2 * 365 = 730
Holding cost per unit per year = 0.5 * 12 = $6
EOQ = √(2 * 730 * 200) / 6
EOQ = 220.6052281 shirts rounded off to 221 shirts
To calculate how frequently the order should be placed,we will calculate the number of orders per year by dividing the total annual demand by the EOQ.
Number of orders per year = 730 / 220.61
Number of orders per year = 3.309 or 3.31 orders per year
Number of days per order = 365 / 3.309
Number of days per order = 110.305 days or 110 days
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
Answer:
Statement II and III
Explanation:
For Statement I
We know that in a perfect competitive market the profit is maximum where either Marginal Revenue = Marginal Cost, or the Price + Marginal Cost is the point defining the profit.
Therefore, firm having to exercise maximum power in market will produce more up till Marginal Revenue > Marginal Cost.
Therefore, statement I is false.
Statement II
For the time till when the marginal revenue is more than the marginal cost, more and more goods shall be produced to increase the quantum of profit.
as this will assure no losses up to the time where MR>MC.
Thus, statement II is true.
Statement III
If there is no cost of production then entire amount received for a good will be profit, accordingly till the time the marginal revenue does not fall to 0 the goods shall be supplied to consumers, as the entire amount received will be profit with no cost associated.
Thus, statement III is also True.