Answer:
B. they became more economically self-sufficient
Explanation:
The colonies were experiencing lot of changes because of the imperialism. Once the imperialists were establishing their power, they immediately started to implement numerous things that were going in their advantage. Their were big cultural influences, including the forcing of their own culture over the natives, imposing their religion, making their language official language etc. They were also building lot of new infrastructure in order to achieve their economic goals through exploitation of the natural resources of the colony. One thing that didn't happened is that the colonies were becoming more self-sufficient. The reason for this was that the colonies were under total economic control and dependence of the foreign investments, so the whole profit was going out of them. Also, the means through which the profit was made were totally under the control of the colonists, so without them, the colonies were not going to be able to do anything to sustain themselves economically.
i'm like 80% sure its developed new Buddhist traditions
B. Create parallelism by showing the opposing argument side-by-side
C. To create a simile by comparing arguments to each other
D. To build paid those by showing he feels bad for his opponents
The correct argument is A;
To build ethos by showing he understands the other side.
By showing that he understood the opposing argument, Thomas Paine demonstrated his great understanding of America under British rule. This allowed him to gain credibility, since he is well-versed and knowledgeable in many areas, not just when it comes to supporting his own argument.
Thomas Paine highlighted the opposing view of the colonies prospering under British rule to build ethos and strengthen his argument in his pamphlet 'Common Sense'. Therefore, option A is correct.
Thomas Paine, in his persuasive pamphlet 'Common Sense,' brings up the opposing argument that the colonies have prospered under British control with intention: He aims to build ethos by demonstrating his comprehensive understanding of the other side's viewpoint.
It's a rhetoric strategy often applied in persuasive writing; by acknowledging and then refuting an opposing viewpoint, the writer not only demonstrates a thorough understanding of the issue at hand, but also strengthens their own argument and credibility.
#SPJ11
Imhotep
Hatshepsut
Tutankhamun
Answer:
The correct answer is Akhenaten
Explanation:
To many people are getting this one wrong.
Somebody help !
Answer:
He's influenced by things—by music, by poetry, by writing—that came long before the 1960s. He wasn't born just full blown out of that moment. And he has continued to work and to write and to reflect and to produce great art, long, long after 1969. So it's important to see Dylan's work in that longer view.