Answer:
Explanation below.
Explanation:
The recommendation that I will give or propose is that the agreement must have a legal backing.
This is the best recommendation that a wise person can proposes. It is a show of height of stupidity when an individual go into conjunction with another person without any written agreement that is backed legally. This because, when there is a problem in the future, the documents will be a way to solve it.
The other secondary option is written and signed agreement with video recording. This is not as good as the one mentioned above, but can still be considered as an alternative.
1. I am sending you this letter to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise within our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we will solve it.
A) We need to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise with our expense sheet, but we are midway to an end result.
B) We have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.
C) I am sending you this letter to inform you that we have a problem with our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we have a solution.
Answer:
The best revision for the following sentence is:
B) We have identified a problem with our expense sheet, but we will solve it.
Explanation:
In e-mail, letters, messages, memos, and other business documents intended for a busy audience who appreciates getting the information they need quickly and easily, replacing a phrases with a word in a formal tone, detracting from adding meaning: "we have identified" instead of: "I am sending" or "we need to inform you", keeping the sentence just as it is with certain rhythm and concise.
Otherwise in option 1. I am sending you this letter to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise within our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we will solve it.
The sentence has a redundant pair: "send" and "inform", it is “wordy,” and includes irrelevant “fillers” as "unexpected" that makes it lack of conciseness in the substantive information, not getting to the point promptly. I also includes passive voice which is not a grammatical error, but it often leads to using more words than necessary frustrating or confusing the audience; and it has prepositional phrases overuse: "that", within", "but" making this sentence clunky and unclear.
In option A) We need to inform you that we have experienced an unexpected surprise with our expense sheet, but we are midway to an end result.
The sentence has unnecessary modifiers: "unexpected" and "end", and passive voice again.
In option C) I am sending you this letter to inform you that we have a problem with our expense sheet, but we are positively certain we have a solution.
The sentence has unnecessary modifier: "positively".
Answer:
$12,750 and $1,250
Explanation:
The computation of the dividend paid is shown below:
For 2021, the preference dividend is
= 1700 shares × $50 × 5%
= $4,250
Since in 2019 and 2020 the dividend is not paid
So, For 2019 and for 2020, the preference dividend is
= $4,250 × 2 years
= $8,500
So total preference dividend is
= $4,250 + $8,500
= $12,750
And, the total dividend paid is $14,000
So, for the common stockholder, it is
= $14,000 - $12,750
= $1,250
Answer:
The correct answer is b. Total revenue will fall.
Explanation:
The equation for the price elasticity of demand (PED) is ε =
where Q represents the quantity, P represents the price and d represents variation.
If the demand for a product is highly elastic, mathematically it means that the PED in absolute value is greater than 1.
|ε| > ⇒ |ε| > 1
Economically that means that the quantity demanded of that product will decrease more than proportionally to the increase in price of that same product. In other words, the company will experience that a increase in price of its product raises the revenue for each unit sold, but given that the PED is highly elastice an increase in price reduces the number of units actually sold to the extent the company's total revenue actually falls.
Answer:
Some of the fiscal solutions that Davidson mentions tweaking in a bid to cut government spending multiple subtle ways are as follows: 1. Raise social security retirement age
2. Reduce medicare for wealthy seniors
3. Raise medical healthcare contributions question
According to davidson, the republican and the democrat philosophies are two fundamentally different economic philosophies that impact the debt crisis faced by the united states. in his opinion, the republicans want a system in which the government’s only job should be to create an efficient society, whereas the democrats aim at making sure that everyone lives in an “equitable, fair society”. i think i would agree more with the democrat philosophy because equity and fairness to everyone is a key public value outcome in every society.question
The two fiscal issues that are hyper-partisan are as follows: i. military defense spending. ii. issues of taxes - the parties are so divided chiefly because they have extreme opposites points of view on several issues.- on the issues, i lean towards the democrat view. question
Towards the end of his talk, davidson says he fears that the longer we delay any solution, the more the world will look to the u.s. not as the bedrock of stability in the global economy, but as a place that can't resolve its own fights. he explains that the higher interest rates are going to be, the quicker we're going to have to face a day of horrible calamity.
Answer:
The fiscal solutions that Davidson offer are raising the social security retirement age, reducing Medicare for wealthy seniors, and raising medical healthcare contributions question.
Explanation:
Answer:
what is the value of a share of Gillette stock if the firm's equity cost of capital is 8.8 %?
$ 13,36
Explanation:
First it's necessary to find the present value of the annual dividend paid during the next 6 years, which is calculate by the formula of the Present Value.
PV = Dt / (1+r)^t , it means that each Dividend at the year "t" will be value with the rate r calculated a this same moment "t".
Year 1
0,61 = Div
1,09 = (1+0,88)^1
0,56 = Div/1,09
Year 2
0,69 = Div Year 1(0,61) * 1,129, because increase at 12,9% by year
1,18 = (1+0,88)^2
0,58 = Div/1,18
Year 3
0,78 = Div Year 2(0,69) * 1,129, because increase at 12,9% by year
1,29 = (1+0,88)^3
0,60 = Div/1,18
Year 4
0,88 = Div Year 3(0,78) * 1,129, because increase at 12,9% by year
1,24 = (1+0,88)^4
0,63 = Div/1,24
Year 5
0,99 = Div Year 4(0,88) * 1,129, because increase at 12,9% by year
1,52 = (1+0,88)^5
0,65 = Div/1,52
Year 6
1,12 = Div Year 5(0,99) * 1,129, because increase at 12,9% by year
1,66 = (1+0,88)^6
0,67 = Div/1,66
PV of 6 Years= 0,56 + 0,58 + 0,60 + 0,63 + 0,65 + 0,67 = $3,70
To this second part the model indicates that de dividend is calculated by = Dividend /(Rate-Growth) , which means that if a dividend grows forever, we applied the perpetuity formula where dividend growth it's applied as negative to the discount rate.
Year 6
1,14 = Div Year 6(1,12) * 1,017, thereafter will growth at 1,7% by year.
7,1% = (8,8%-1-7%) Discount rate less growth of dividend.
16,03 = Div/0,071 = In this case we use the rate not the 1+rate.
This value it's calculated at the moment of Year 7, we need to apply the Present Value to calculate the actual value, which is:
16,03 = Perpetuity calculated before until year 6.
1,66 = Discount Rate applied this year.
9,66 = Present Value of the Dividen which grows forever at 1,7%
TOTAL Value of Share = PV of 6 Years + PV Perpetuity =
$3,70 + $9,66=$13,36
Answer:
False
Explanation:
This is a True/False question and the answer is false because of the reason highlighted below.
When there's a decrement in the values of the market price of a 100 shares, there's a high probability that one will receive a margin call. The essence of the margin call is none other than asking to make up for the loss in the decreased value of the 100 shares because legally, the brokerage firm have the right to sell one's shares in other to cover your losses.
And also because, buying on margin can never be an "interest free.", this is the reason why the broker will demand the payment of interest on the loan.
The question discusses margin trading in the stock market, where the investor borrows money from a broker to buy more shares. In this example, the investor buys 100 IBM shares at $120 each, contributing half the total cost and borrowing the rest. If the share price rises, the investor can sell, repay the loan, and make a profit.
The topic here is related to stock market investing and more specifically, margin trading. When you buy on margin, you are essentially borrowing money from your broker to purchase more stocks than you could with just your available cash. In your example, you bought 100 shares of IBM for $120/share, which totals $12,000.
Since the margin on your account is 50%, this means that you only need to provide half of this amount, or $6,000, and the broker will loan you the remaining $6,000. The goal is that the price of IBM shares sufficiently rises, at which point you may choose to sell your shares, repay the broker's $6,000 loan, and then keep any remaining profit as your capital gain.
#SPJ3