The time that has elapsed between Act I and Act II is _____.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The Second Act begins much like the first act, but three years later on Emily and George's wedding day. Dr. and Mrs. Gibbs talk about how young the couple are, and what their own marriage was like in its early days. George goes next door to visit Emily, but her parents prevent the bridegroom from seeing his bride; he chats awkwardly with Mr. Webb about the value of marriage. 
hope this helped.

Related Questions

What word in the following sentence is an adjective? Jason's sturdy ship sailed bravely across the wine-dark sea.a. bravelyb. sailedc. sturdyd. across
The Iroquois use the ideas in this myth toA: Explain how natural phenomena came to beB:describe why animals are important to peopleC: Explain the complexities of human relationshipsD:describe the reasons people use different hands
Select the symbol that indicates best that the conflict in Rome is a political one.
At which point should you ask an expert for help in improving reading comprehension?a. neverb. before you start readingc. after you finish reading and you are reviewing your notes for the testd. after you have used other repair strategies to help understand difficult parts of a selection
Match the meter with the foot 1.arrived 2.sorry 3.honestly 4.intervene Iambic, trochaic, anapestic, dactylic

How do judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent? A. The majority opinion uses cases with similar conclusions as support.
B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
C. The majority opinion uses summaries provided by the case attorneys.
D. The majority opinion uses the dissent as the basis of the argument.

Answers

The correct answer is B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decision on the case of evidence.

Judicial review is termed as a process which legislative or executive actions are being subjected to review by the judiciary.

Only the judicial review can invalidate government actions and laws which are being incompatible to higher authority.

Law can be invalidated either by violating the constitutional terms or by being unlawful.

Judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent by B. The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.

Further explanation

Judicial review is a process which executive or legislative actions are subjected to review by the judiciary. The other meaning of it is when justices look at the previous courts decisions on the case

Whereas dissent itself is an opinion in a legal case when judges disagree and there are others such as the majority that agrees.  When one or more judges express disagreement with the majority opinion of the members of the court, it is said that they are dissenting.

Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence in a judicial review. While dissenting opinions can be cited in other cases when a change in the law is needed. The dissent uses the majority opinion as evidence of its case.

Learn more

  1. Learn more about Judicial reviews brainly.com/question/8548628
  2. Learn more about the case attorneys brainly.com/question/2810347
  3. Learn more about  courts' decisions brainly.com/question/1465434

Answer details

Grade:  9

Subject:  English

Chapter:  Judicial reviews

Keywords:  Judicial reviews, the dissent, The majority opinion, courts' decisions, the case attorneys

What is full of holes but still holds water?”

Answers

Answer:

my brain, organs and limbs

Explanation:

but actually, a Heart

Maria is writing a persuasive essay for her English class. She asks Marshall if it is important to use rhetorical appeals in her essay. Which reasons could Marshall give in favor of using rhetorical appeals?A. They evoke an emotional response from readers.
B. They dazzle readers with the writer’s depth of knowledge.
C. They help the writer avoid seeming biased to readers.
D. They appeal to readers’ sense of logic.
E. They discredit a paper that presents a contrary opinion.

There's 2 answers!!

Answers

b seem to be correct to me

A. They evoke an emotional response from readers.

D. They appeal to readers’ sense of logic.

Good luck :)

The style of writing that uses fragmented thoughts running through a character's mind is known asa. stream of consciousness.
b. figurative language.
c. exposition.
d. formal syntax.

Answers

(A) stream of consciousness

The stream of consciousness is a relatively new literary technique used by modern writers in which the writer takes a reader into the mind of the character and is allowed insight into his/her conscious and unconscious thoughts and desires. The fragmented sentences are used to represent the way thoughts keep jumping about in our minds.

Which words make up the compound direct object in the sentence?The youth group cleaned the shed and garage for Mrs. Brown.

Choose all answers that are correct.

A.
group

B.
shed

C.
cleaned

D.
garage

Answers

The words that make up the compound direct object in the sentence are: option B. shed, and option D. garage. A direct object is a word or a group of words that receives the action of the subject. It always answers the question "what?".

Which word set completes the following analogy? ruler : carpenter :: gardener : shovel farmer : tractor walk : horse chalk : teacher

Answers

Answer: D) chalk : teacher.

Explanation: an analogy is a comparison between one thing and another, usually with the purpose of explanation or clarification, this comparison is based on one similarity or difference between specific features of two things. The relation between the first pair of words "ruler" and "carpenter" is that the first word is a tool, and the second one is a job (the carpenter uses the ruler). The pair of words that follows this same relation, is "chalk" and "teacher" (the teacher uses the chalk).

the answer is chalk : teacher. a ruler is a item and so is the chalk so the ruler : carpenter as the chalk : teacher