Answer:
avoid bodily fluids from other people.
Explanation:
B.It included land that became more than a dozen states.
C.It gave the United States control of the Mississippi River.
D.It extended the nation's boundary to the Pacific Ocean
The statement which incorrectly describes the Louisana Purchase is that it extended the nation's boundary to the Pacific Ocean. The correct option is d.
The Louisiana Purchase was the acquisition of the territory of Louisiana by the United States from the French First Republic in 1803. In return for fifteen million dollars, or approximately eighteen dollars per square mile, the United States nominally acquired a total of 828,000 sq mi in Middle America.
However, France only controlled a small fraction of this area, most of which was inhabited by Native Americans; effectively, for the majority of the area, the United States bought the "preemptive" right to obtain "Indian" lands by treaty or by conquest, to the exclusion of other colonial powers. The Kingdom of France controlled the Louisiana territory from 1699 until it was ceded to Spain in 1762.
In 1800, Napoleon, the First Consul of the French Republic, regained ownership of Louisiana as part of a broader effort to re-establish a French colonial empire in North America.
Learn more about Purchase, here:
#SPJ3
laws regarding slavery.
Answer:
Plantation owners gained a lot of influence in Texas before the civil war because they became wealthy and controlled a lot of land. They filled representative positions in local governments and used their wealth to influence policies on slavery.
Explanation:
Slavery in Texas grew in the 1830s through the 1850s as more Anglo-American settlers from states in the southeast came to Texas, bringing their slaves with them as well. After the Revolution in Texas in 1836, slavery was made legal. When Texas was under Mexican control there was tension on the slavery issue because slavery was outlawed in Mexico. Legislation was passed that assured slavery would endure. Most of the slaves worked plantations in East Texas where they grew crops like cotton. These plantation owners held most of the wealth in Texas and thus they dominated many levels of government in the state.
Answer:
Texas plantation owners created the upper class of Texas. Slaves were very expensive to purchase, so only people who had money to begin with or were able to make a lot of money could afford to purchase slaves. Plantation owners made a great deal of money from their crops, producing 90% of the cotton in Texas at this time. There were only a few plantations in Texas, and these few, wealthy people wanted to maintain their wealth and position in society. They needed slaves to do so. They made sure that they had positions of authority that would allow slavery to continue in Texas. These people used their position and money to influence laws that would sustain their way of life and the overall prosperity of Texas.
Hope this Helps!
Answer:
Both Mussolini and Hitler rise to power in Italy and Germany respectively.
Explanation:
The sophists never set up a proper school. These are the differences with a philosopher:
The Sophist: an itinerant man who pretended to know him know everything. He said he knew and knew "the truth".
The Philosopher: a man who thinks, questions, analyzes and concludes his concepts about reality, life, existence and never claims to "know everything", but rather, he is in search of truth, because he recognizes that those who say " to know it truthfully "or that" they know where is the truth? ", those are the ones who are furthest from it. Those who claim to "know the truth" or "own the truth" are the false ones.
The Sophist: by pretending to "know everything", he went to the public square and sought to teach his "false knowledge" in exchange for money.
The Philosopher: does not seek to teach "false knowledge", but rather seeks to teach logic and coherence of what is thought to what is said or what is said and not practiced in life. The philosopher recognizes that a life without questioning does not deserve to be lived.
The Sophist: he used to preach new "ideals" for the mental formation of the Athenian citizen, because they used to teach that everyone who wants to succeed in public life has to know how to IMPOSE and CONVINCE in the assemblies of the people, everything that he affirms as true, it is not.
The Philosopher: never seeks to impose anything, but seeks to EXHIBIT his arguments, which are not inspired by the lie, but in the reason, in the logic, in the inductive-deductive processes of human knowledge and thereby specify much better the issues raised.
The Sophist: he had to find the way (even resorting to lies) of how to CONVINCE others that his "truth" is "the truth." It should also be remembered that when the sophist persuades and convinces, it is because he has only touched points. Its convenience, and not the love of knowledge. The sophist did not care if what he taught was good or not, period.
The Philosopher: he speaks well, and eloquently, but when it comes to differentiating the philosopher from the sophist, we must be aware that the philosopher can teach even if they do not pay him, while the sophist will always seek to be paid before teaching.
The Sophist: he will talk about things that he claims "to know" but he does not care if what he teaches is true or not, as long as he is paid.
The Philosopher: he will teach things that he has learnt through the researches carried out and he will gladly share them with his friends, without expecting any retribution.
What caused the GoldRush? People wanted to find gold andstrike it rich.
What was Manifest Destiny? Thebelief the U.S. should extend from Atlantic to Pacific coasts. It was awidely held belief in the United States that its settlers were destined toexpand across North America.
In the early 1800s, many people in the United States migrated westwardsbecause of the availability of farmland
he did it anyways to pretty much say that he did not acknowledge the confederacy. sent in merchant ships.