Answer:
In President Barack Obama's argument about immigration, it is used Pathos and Logos. We can see Pathos when he tries to get to the audience feelings of pity, disgrace, and empathy for those families who come into the U.S and have to face hardships such as racism. He's trying to provoke certain emotions talking about those families struggles and sufferings. He's using an emotional resource. Logos is seen when he talks about facts, about the fact that racism is still an issue in the U.S and that immigrants do are part of the American community as well. He's using logic and facts. In President Donald Trump's argument about immigration, it is used Pathos, Ethos, and Logos. Pathos is seen when he tries to convey feelings of sorrow and pity for the American families who lose their jobs because of immigrants getting American's jobs. He tries to convey those feelings towards the hardships that American's face up to the immigrant's situation. Logos is seen in the last sentence Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States. He uses logic to persuade the audience, he is trying to convince people that is statement is ethically correct and therefore, logical. Ethos is seen in the last and first sentence. He uses his authority to convince people about his argument being correct.
Comparing Obama and Trump's rhetoric reveals Obama's use of structured, traditional presidential speech with figurative language, while Trump preferred a direct, conversational tone with repetitive phrases and bold statements. Both effectively appealed to their audiences with distinct rhetorical devices.
When comparing the rhetorical devices used by President Obama and President Trump, it's essential to consider elements such as figurative language, numerical data, and repetition. President Obama often utilized a more traditional presidential rhetoric, characterized by structured speech patterns, elevated vocabulary, and a calm, steady delivery aimed at uniting various segments of the population. He was known to use metaphors and similes to draw comparisons and create vivid imagery in his speeches. An example includes the use of parallel structure in his calls for national unity and progress, as seen in his inaugural addresses.
On the other hand, President Trump's rhetorical style was more direct and informal, frequently employing personal anecdotes, rhetorical questions, and a conversational tone. His speeches often featured repetitive phrases designed to reinforce his message and resonate with his audience on an emotional level. Trump's rhetoric also included the use of jarring and provocative statements, which helped him to capture media attention and speak directly to his supporters' concerns. Both presidents effectively used rhetorical devices to appeal to their respective audiences, though their methods and delivery differed significantly.
#SPJ3
Paying for both the bus trip and buying tickets for the shows will not be cheap.
Paying for both the bus trip and tickets for the shows will not be cheap.
Conflict by avoidance is not healthy in sustaining positive relationship as it leads to the neglect of the other person.
It should be noted that conflict simply means the disagreement that occurs between people.
Conflict by avoidance is not healthy in sustaining positive relationship as it leads to the neglect of the other person.
Learn more about conflicts on: