A historian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in Europe during the Middle Ages. She reads a speech by a bishop in the Middle Ages claiming that kings were appointed by God to rule over people. She then explains why the bishop would have believed this idea, even if it is not one that most people believe today. What is she doing in this paper?The historian is explaining cause and effect.
The historian is placing the argument in historical context.
The historian is comparing and contrasting primary sources.
The historian is developing a hypothesis.

Answer:

1). Democracy  - many people run the government and have a say in decisions.

2). Autocracy  - one person makes all decisions for the government.

3). Absolutism  - It is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited centralized authority and absolutely sovereignty, vested in a monarch or dictator. The leader is not kept in check by any other governing body.

4.). Monarchy - It is a form of rule in which a single person has an undivided rule of absolute sovereignty

5). Constitutional Monarchy - It is a government where the monarch and the constitutionally organized governing body share power. The monarch is the head of state, but the decisions are made by the government.

Explanation:

1). Democracy is defined as the rule by the people, especially as a form of government; either directly or through elected representatives. It is basically described as the rule to the people, for the people, and by the people.

2). Autocracy is described as the form of the government in which unlimited power is held by a single individual and he/she is responsible for making all the decisions for the government.

3). Absolutism is described in political doctrine as the principles or practice of absolute or arbitrary government that is endowed in the dictator or monarch.

4). Monarchy is characterized as the government in which sovereignty is embodied within an individual and he/she possesses the entire power.

5). Constitutional monarchy is a monarchy is a monarchy in which the monarch's power is legally constrained, ranging from where minor concessions have been made to appease certain factions to where the monarch is a figurehead with all real power in hands of a legislative body.

Answer:

1). Democracy  - many people run the government and have a say in decisions.

2). Autocracy  - one person makes all decisions for the government.

3). Absolutism  - It is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited centralized authority and absolutely sovereignty, vested in a monarch or dictator. The leader is not kept in check by any other governing body.

4.). Monarchy - It is a form of rule in which a single person has an undivided rule of absolute sovereignty

5). Constitutional Monarchy - It is a government where the monarch and the constitutionally organized governing body share power. The monarch is the head of state, but the decisions are made by the government.

Explanation:

1). Democracy is defined as the rule by the people, especially as a form of government; either directly or through elected representatives. It is basically described as the rule to the people, for the people, and by the people.

2). Autocracy is described as the form of the government in which unlimited power is held by a single individual and he/she is responsible for making all the decisions for the government.

3). Absolutism is described in political doctrine as the principles or practice of absolute or arbitrary government that is endowed in the dictator or monarch.

4). Monarchy is characterized as the government in which sovereignty is embodied within an individual and he/she possesses the entire power.

5). Constitutional monarchy is a monarchy is a monarchy in which the monarch's power is legally constrained, ranging from where minor concessions have been made to appease certain factions to where the monarch is a figurehead with all real power in hands of a legislative body.

Explanation:

The concept of total war can destroy or help a warring countries economy. The warring country will see an increase in jobs and work because of being at war, but if they lose the war the economy will suffer. Ex: women became a significant part of the work force since they replaced the men at war