What did mary and louis leaky discover that affected our understanding of early hominids?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:  Skull fossils found by theLeakeys advanced our understanding of human evolution. ... Origins of Humankind.......Mary Leakey's discovery of early human ...

Related Questions

Although the American Federation of Labor worked to improve the lives of workers in the early twentieth century, they generally looked down onA. only blacks.B. blacks and women.C. white men.D. only women.
Which of the following demonstrates how the United States Constitution isa flexible and living document?O political party conventionsO Senate committee hearingsO national presidential electionsthe amendment process
Describe two features of the religious settlement (4marks)
Which news and entertainment medium did President Roosevelt use to deliver his fireside chats to the American public? A. newspapers B. television C. magazines D. radio
Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson all approved of the United States backing the South Vietnamese in their civil war. a. True b. False

What was the founders of Massachusetts ?

Answers

Massachusetts Bay Colony, one of the original English settlements in present-day Massachusetts, settled in 1630 by a group of about 1,000 Puritan refugees from England under Gov. John Winthrop and Deputy Gov. Thomas Dudley.

from: britannica. Com

What were four factors that led to german defeat in the battle of britain

Answers

Answer:

Explanation:

Early warning system of radar and observers

Royal Air Force (RAF)

Luftwaffe

Built more spitfires and hawkers

Historically the role of the cabinet in the presidents decision making may be described as?

Answers

Advisory. The cabinet of ministers would advise the president about the pros and cons of each decision and ultimately, it would be the President's decision to make.

The build-up of the U.S. military in 1916 was an example ofA. internationalism.
B. isolationism.
C. neutrality.
D. preparedness.

Answers

The correct answer is D. preparedness.

The United States initially wanted to stay out of the war and that was even a part of Wilson's slogan during his candidacy. However, when they realized that they would no longer be able to stay out of the war, they started preparing by training people to join the army which would be used to participate in the war on various European fronts.

The build-up of US Military in 1916 was an example of preparedness.

Further Explanations:

During First World WarLeonardo wood and Theodore Roosevelt led a military Campaign to reinforce their army and named it as Preparedness Movement. It proclaimed that there is urgent need of army reinforcement and strong naval and land corps for defence. It was assumed that US will enter the War soon. Leonardo Wood, Theodore Roosevelt and former secretaries Eli Hu Rootandand Henry Stimson were known to be the steering forces behind the movement.

President Woodrow Roosevelt first of all opposed the movement because of his belief in neutrality. His attitude changed after the incursion on Columbus, New Mexico by Pancho Villa in 1916. He passed National Defence Act 1916 and authorized expanding of US Military force to 400,000 by 1921.It also augmented on long-term expanding of US Navy.

The Preparedness Movement gave a pragmatic philosophy of world’s affair that economic strength and defensive strength is more influential than unrealistic movement.

Learn more :

1. Why did Roosevelt’s republican challenger Alfred Landon fail in his bid for the presidency in 1936?brainly.com/question/9422998

2. Why did United States navy commodore George?brainly.com/question/1447223

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: First World War

Keywords: First World War, Leonardo wood, Theodore Roosevelt, Preparedness Movement, Eli Hu Rootand, Henry Stimson, Columbus, New Mexico, Pancho Villa, National Defence Act, pragmatic

What type of claim does an argument of value make?

Answers

Argument of value tend to argue whether an act / event is described as something 'good' or ' bad'
so, the type of claim that an argument of value make is :whether something is good or not

hope this helps

Apex answer: (It makes a claim about whether something is good) Thought i would make it easier to understand :)

Explain how Chinese philosophies presented a different version of an ideal ruler

Answers

The Zhou dynasty ruled China from c. 1046 BC to 256 BC. They believed they had the Mandate of Heaven, God's divine will for them to rule. Such mandate consisted of a cycle, so every dynasty would eventually decay after a period of prosperity, become authoritarian, Heaven would sent signs to show the people the ruler has lost its favour, such as droughts and famine, so the people would riot against the emperor, overthrow him and a new leader would rise to occupy his place, starting a new dynasty cycle of prosperity, decay, disasters and riots.

The Zhou used a relationship system called feudalism, they gave some loyal supporters lands and absolute power over the peasants working those lands, in exchange for soldiers. This system worked for a while until 700 BC, when landlords began fighting each other. These troubled times led some scholars to debate the proper way to rule. Three major philosophies come from this.

- Confucianism: it establishes basic relationships of people, ruler and subject, husband and wife, father and  son, older sibling and younger sibling, and friend and friend. The first element is the one that rules, and the other one must obey. It establishes that the correct way of ruling is by example: the first element of it pair must set good example.

- Daoism:  based on the  ancient Chinese idea of the Dao, or "the Way", the force that gives order to the natural universe. It established that everyone must find dao by themselves, too many rules conflicts with the natural flow. So the best way of ruling is by ruling the least.

- Legalism: this particular conception believes that people are selfish and act upon their own interest. So good ruling would be to establish strong laws, to enforce them and to set harsh punishments to those who break them, in order to create some order in society.