The same language can be the different ways. Because they may use different sounds. As the different make of the words will be there, As they can put the words, To make a sentence.
Language is a set of common spoken, manual (signed), or written symbols that people use to communicate as members of a social group and members of that group's culture. When people in a particular country or region talk or write, they use a particular set of sounds and written symbols, which together make up their language.
As per the natural language, speaking the same language may reduce the creative scope as well. The innovativeness is there. And it may press us all into the same mold. By knowing the different languages we can make cultural identities and expressions.
Therefore, As a result, By knowing the different languages we can make the expression, And keeps us in the touch with our heritage.
Learn more about the language here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
It all depends on the viewpoint of different people.
Explanation:
Something can mean one thing for one person, and have a completely different meaning to someone else. I could say something and you could repeat it, but it could mean something entirely different to you than it does me.
Find the DO (Direct object in the sentence above)
HELP :C
I will give you an example....
I'll be reviewing on the latest marvel movie.
Captain Marvel.
Here is the review example: Fierce, Unapologetic, Warrior. I loved the movie so much I want to see it again. Brie Larson's acting was great in the movie! Can't wait for Avengers: Endgame
Critical Review example: I don't know how people love this movie, it is the worst movie in the MCU. The only part I really liked was the Stan Lee Cameo and the beginning where they thanked Stan for all of his support in the MCU. Other than that bad movie.
I hope this helped you!
By S. E. Forman
1911
THE MATCH
There never was a time when the world was without fire, but there was a time when men did not know how to kindle fire; and after they learned how to kindle one, it was a long, long time before they learned how to kindle one easily. In these days we can kindle a fire without any trouble, because we can easily get a match; but we must remember that the match is one of the most wonderful things in the world, and that it took men thousands of years to learn how to make one. Let us learn the history of this familiar little object, the match.
Fire was first given to man by nature itself. When a forest is set on fire by cinders from a neighboring volcano, or when a tree is set ablaze by a thunderbolt, we may say that nature strikes a match. In the early history of the world, nature had to kindle all the fires, for man by his own effort was unable to produce a spark. The first method, then, of getting fire for use was to light sticks of wood at a flame kindled by nature—by a volcano, perhaps, or by a stroke of lightning. These firebrands were carried to the home and used in kindling the fires there. The fire secured in this way was carefully guarded and was kept burning as long as possible. But the flame, however faithfully watched, would sometimes be extinguished. A sudden gust of wind or a sudden shower would put it out. Then a new firebrand would have to be secured, and this often meant a long journey and a deal of trouble.
In 1827, John Walker, a druggist in a small English town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. The druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. It is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. Although Walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. It could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. In a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. The match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. It would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. This was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar.
Why does the author include details about the difficulty of getting fire before matches?
A.) By showing the importance of matches today
B.) By providing a history of how matches developed
C.) By showing how nature created fire
D.) By providing the history of John Walker’s work
I am saying A.) By showing the importance of matches today. Because if it didn't include the parts about how fire was so hard to get before matches then matches wouldn't seem as important.
Which line from the poem best exemplifies this value?
A)
As a fond mother, when the day is o'er,
B)
And leave his broken playthings on the floor,
9
Leads us to rest so gently, that we go
D)
Being too full of sleep to understand
Answer:
A) As a fond mother, when the day is o'er
Explanation:
Maternal presence means motherhood and this phrase from the poem is the only one of the answer choices that mentions motherhood and nurture