Many linguistics agree language developed in two stages, beginning with noises and gestures.
Some linguists agreed that noises and gestures were the initial forms of the communication system through which the primitive people communicated with each other. The history of language development shows the progression and emergence of the language system. At the beginning, the human being started to communicate within their groups through the system of noises and gestures. Later on, these gestures and noises turnt into words with helped by the sounds they generated. Thus, they started to create phrases, sentences and then the language as a whole.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Thomas Edison." Thomas Edison improved the incandescent light bulb and he made it possible to quit using oil lamps as a source of light, which sometimes unsafe.
Odyssey ware Answer: Thomas Edison
B. They showed evidence that Julius Rosenberg was a spy.
C. They corroborated most of Joseph McCarthy's claims.
D. They created a blacklist of supposed Communists.
They showed evidence that Julius Rosenberg was a spy
Answer:
President Bush's reasons for going to war proved false.
Explanation:
President George W. Bush asserted that Iraq's leader was funding Islamic terrorists and stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, and both accusations proved to be false.
Answer:
Explanation:
The role of women depended a lot of their social statutes and their race. In any case, women had an important role in this events, they participated producing goods for soldiers, spying on the British, even boycotting British goods.
Somehow, they took part an important part but with 'women tasks' most of the time.
Answer:
Pope Urban made a very public and urgent plea in 1095 to all of Christendom after receiving a letter from the Byzantine Emperor Alexis describing the increasing danger from the Seljuk Turks, Tartars from Asia, who had already conquered the caliphate of Baghdad in 1055 and now were seeking to expand their empire into the Holy Land. All of the history you have heard about the Crusades is so much hogwash:
from Seven Lies About Catholic History, by Diane Moczar
Unprovoked Muslim aggression in the seventh century brought large parts of the southern Byzantine Empire, including Syria, the Holy Land, and Egypt under Arab rule. Christians who survived the conquests found themselves subject to a special poll tax and discriminated against as an inferior class known as dhimmi. Often their churches were destroyed and other harsh conditions imposed. For centuries their complaints had been reaching Rome, but Europe was having its own Dark Age of massive invasion, and nothing could be done to relieve the plight of eastern Christians.
By the eleventh century, under the rule of a new Muslim dynasty, conditions worsened. The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, site of the Crucifixion was destroyed, along with a large number of other churches, and Christian pilgrims were massacred. In 1067 a group of seven thousand peaceful German pilgrims lost two-thirds of their number to Muslim assaults. By this time the popes, including St. Gregory VII, were actively trying to rally support for relief of eastern Christians, though without success. It was not until the very end of the century, in 1095, that Pope Urban's address at Clermont in France met with a response-though not quite the one he had hoped for. But the response was what we now call the First Crusade.
"The general consensus of opinion among medievalists . . . is tha thte Crusades were military expeditions organized by the peoples of Western Christendom, notably the Normans and the French, under the leadership of the Roman Popes, for the recover of the Holy Places from their Muslim masters." This seems to sum up most neatly what the Crusades really were and how their participants actually viewed them. The Crusades were not colonialist or commercial ventures, they were not intended to force Christianity on Jews and Muslims, and they were not the projects of individual warlords. Their primary goal, in addition to the defense of the Eastern Empire, was the recovery of the Holy Land for Christendom, and they acknowledged the leadership of the Popes. As French historian Louis Brehier wrote, 'the popes alone understood the menace of Islam's progress for christian civilization.'"
Explanation: