Which of the groups below has succeeded in destroying the Byzantine Empire? A. Germanic tribes B. Turks C. Arabs D. Huns

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: "Turks" was the group among the choices given in the question that succeeded in destroying the Byzantine Empire. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope the answer has actually come to your desired help.
Answer 2
Answer: Turks destroyed the Byzantine Empire, the answer is B:)

Related Questions

In what U.S. state was the Seneca Falls Convention held?A. New YorkB. MarylandC. AlabamaD. New Jersey
What hardships did the south face after the civil war????
Why did Spanish leaders want to push Spanish control into North America in the mid-1500s?a. North America had a large amount of gold and silver.b. Spain decided to engage in the fur trade on a large scale.c. Spain wanted to keep European rivals far away from valuable towns and mines in Mexico.d. The Spanish were driven from their colonies by a Native American uprising.
Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos all share a major river that empties into the South China Sea. It was also the site of many battles during the Vietnam War. What is this river called? Yangtze Yellow Mekong Ganges
Why was the Tennis Court Oath a significant event of the French Revolution?It solidified the people’s resolve for constitutional reforms. It forced King Louis XVI and his family to flee Versailles. It encouraged several nobles to join the National Assembly. It sought to strengthen and empower French women. It urged the royal soldiers to disobey Louis XVI’s commands.

Dachau and Auschwitz were ____

Answers

Dachau and Auschwitz were two well-known concentration camps of the many that Nazi Germany opened. Dachau was ostensibly a detention camp for dissenters and "political prisoners", but many, many people died there. Auschwitz was an outright death camp, where people were sent to be killed by "annihilation by work", or by being sent directly to the gas chambers.

Between the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and Diocletian, what type of rulers were usually in control of the Roman Empire?

Answers

Between the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and Diocletian, bad leaders ruled in between. While both of the mentioned rulers served and were considered to have been good roman rulers, others that came in between weren't considered as good with their reigns rather short-lived.

In which area(s) shown on this graph did the Union and the Confederacy experience the most comparable numbers of social costs?Soldiers who died from wounds
Soldiers who died from diseases
Soldiers who were wounded
Total deaths of soldiers

Answers

The area of the graph in which the Union and the Confederacy experienced the most comparable numbers of social costs was in Soldiers who died from wounds.

Which area had the most comparable costs?

The area that has the most comparable number of costs when looking at a graph is the area that will see both the Union and the Confederacy having costs that are either the same or very similar to each other.

From the given graph, we can see that the area that has the most comparable social costs for both the Union and the Confederacy is the number of soldiers who died from wounds. The Union's number is 110,070 and the Confederacy's is 94,000. From the graph, this is the area with the closest figures with the Union having more costs in the other areas.

Find out more on Civil War casualties at brainly.com/question/25767481

#SPJ1

Answer:   A) Soldiers who died from wounds

Explanation:

What was the royal colony

Answers

Royal colonies were governed directly by the king through an appointed royal govenor.

How true was the statement by the journalist who wrote after September 11, 2001, "Nothing has changed…Everything has changed"?

Answers

I am not too sure what the phrase "nothing has changed" relates to- perhaps to the fact that the leaders and some every day people said that they would not be intimidated by the terrorists and will continue living their life without fear.

In reality however, "everything has changed" - people no longer feel as safe as they used to and there are a lot more security measures around us.

Compare and contrast the settling of Jamestown to that of the colonies in
Massachusetts

Answers

think about location first. Jamestown had more farming time cause it was farther south. also the soil was very different so the pilgrims needed the Indians help because they could not farm the same things the did back home. Massachusetts was also more religious. where Jamestown was military and economically based.