All the solutions are,
1) 350 is 70% of number 500.
2) 37.5% of 64 is 24.
3) 40% of 6.5 is 2.60.
4) 20% of 140 is 28.
Now, We can simplify all the equation as,
1) Let us assume that a number = x
Hence, We get;
350 = 70% of x
Solve for x,
350 = 70x/100
350 = 7x/10
3500 = 7x
7x = 3500
x = 500
So, 350 is 70% of number 500.
2) Let us assume that, x% of 64 is 24.
Hence, We get;
⇒ x% of 64 = 24
Solve for x;
⇒ x/100 × 64 = 24
⇒ 64x = 2400
⇒ x = 2400 / 64
⇒ x = 37.5%
Hence, 37.5% of 64 is 24.
3) Let us assume that, x% of 6.5 is 2.60
Hence, We get;
x% of 6.5 = 2.6
x/100 x 6.5 = 2.6
6.5x = 260
x = 260/6.5
x = 40
Hence, 40% of 6.5 is 2.60.
4) Let us assume that a number = x
Hence, We get;
20% of 140 = x
20/100 x 140 = x
2800 = 100x
x = 2800 / 100
x = 28
Hence, 20% of 140 is 28.
Learn more about the percent visit:
#SPJ6
Answer:
1. A 500
2. D 37.5
3. B 40%
4.C 28
Step-by-step explanation:
x = −2, x = 0
x = 2, x = 0
x = 0, x = 1 over 2
Answer:
C. x = 2, x = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is:
The customers spend more than the national average in his store
Step-by-step explanation:
The national average is $150.00 with a standard deviation of $30.20.
Sample size n =40
H0: x bar = mu
Ha: x bar >mu
(one tailed test for a single mean)
Sample average x bar = 160
Mean difference = 160-150 =10
std error = 30.20/sqrt 40
=4.775
Test statistic = 2.094
Z critical for 2.5% = 1.96 (one tailed)
Since test statistic > z critical we reject null hypothesis.
Hence the correct answer is:
The customers spend more than the national average in his store.
Answer:
Option A) The customers spend more than the national average in his store.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Population mean, μ = $150.00
Sample mean, = $160
Sample size, n = 40
Alpha, α = 0.025
Population standard deviation, σ = $30.20
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis states that the consumers are spending equal to the national average. The alternative hypothesis states that consumers are spending more than the national average.
We use One-tailed z test to perform this hypothesis.
Formula:
Putting all the values, we have
Now,
Since,
We reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis. Thus, the customers spend more than the national average in his store.
Thus, option A) is a valid conclusion for the manager
Answer: -h
Step-by-step explanation:
If h is a negative number, h would be -h.
For example, if h had a value of 1, 1 as a negative number would be -1.
y=x²-6
are: (Select)
-5) and ( (Select)
-5).
Therefore , the solution of the given problem of equation comes out to be the system of equations' answers are (-1, -5) and (1, -5).
The foundation of a regression model based on linearity is the equation y=mx+b. The inclination is B, and the y-intercept is m. Even though y but also y are separate components, the above line is frequently referred as the "mathematical issues with two variables". Two factors make up bivariate linear equations. There are no simple answers for the applications of linear functions. Y=mx+b .
Here,
We can change the second equation into the first equation to find the solution to the system of equations, which results in:
=> x² + (x²-6) = -4
By condensing and rearrangeing, we obtain:
=> 2x² = 2
=> x² = 1
Consequently, x can either be 1 or -1.
We can determine the appropriate values of y by substituting these values of x into either of the two equations:
When x Equals 1:
=> y = x² - 6 = 1 - 6 = -5
When x Equals -1:
=> y = x² - 6 = 1 - 6 = -5
As a result, the system of equations' answers are (-1, -5) and (1, -5).
To know more about equation visit:
#SPJ1