Answer:
1) expected benefits of cleaning up coal ash site is $27 million
2) The expected benefits of cleaning the site are less than the costs of cleaning them ($30 million cost > $27 million benefits). But the problem is that the cleaning costs will be covered by Duke Energy today, but in the future, there is a risk that the costs will be covered by the state government. Companies are not eternal and even industry leaders like Kodak, Sears, Toys R Us, Radio Shack, GM, etc., have gone bankrupt. The difference between the costs and the benefits is not that large to risk the state government having to pay for the cleaning costs in the future.
Explanation:
Costs of cleaning coal ash $30 million
Expected benefits form cleaning coal ash:
What is the term for protection that guarantees payment to you in the event of financial loss?
Ο Α.
claim
B.
insurance
C.
premium
Reset
Next
Answer:
P905,000
Explanation:
Initial share premium - ordinary = P900,000
Total share premium = P900,000 + (2,000 * P5) - (500 * P10) = P900,000 + P10,000 - P5,000 = P905,000
Therefore, Hahn should report P905,000 as total share premium at December 31, 2012.
Answer:
The Best Cost System is the "Process Costing System"
Explanation:
A Process Costing System amasses costs when an enormous number of indistinguishable units are being created. Right now, is generally proficient to collect expenses at a total level for an enormous group of items and afterward dispense them to the individual units delivered. The supposition that will be that the expense of every unit is equivalent to that of some other unit, so there is no compelling reason to follow data at an individual unit level. The great case of a procedure costing condition is an oil treatment facility, where it is difficult to follow the expense of a particular unit of oil as it travels through the processing plant.
Answer: Process costing system.
Explanation: A process costing system used in the manufacturing industry that accumulates the costs of producing a continuous stream of similar items.
It is calculated thus:
Cost per unit = cost of unit/ expected output in unit.
Using process costing method is very efficient to accumulate costs at an aggregate level for a large batch of products and then allocate the cost to the individual units produced.
There are three types of process costing and they are:
1. Weighted Average Cost
2. FIFO - First In First Out
3. Standard Cost
b. only Pete
c. both Noah and Pete
d. neither Noah nor Pete
b. $360,000.
c. $72,000.
d. $48,000.
Answer:
b. $360,000.
Explanation:
Data provided in the question
Purchase value of the patent = $720,000
At the time of purchase, the patent life is 15 years
And, the useful life of the patent is 10 years
So, the amortization expense recorded value is
= $720,000 ÷ 10 years × 5 years
= $360,000
The five years is counted from the year 2006 to the year 2011
B) machines and factories; chairs and desks
C) knowledge one picks up through education and experience; factories and machines
D) machines and factories; knowledge one picks up through education and training
Answer:
D) machines and factories; knowledge one picks up through education and training
Explanation:
The physical capital is the capital that has the physical existence i.e. tangible. It could be seen, feel, or even touched. examples like plant, machinery etc
While on the other hand the human capital is intangible it only effects the production and the operations
Like - skills, knowledge, experience of a worker
Therefore the option D is correct