Answer:
500-25x ≥ 200 (inequality is ≥)
Step-by-step explanation:
500 to start
-25 per week (or x)
wants at least (≥) 200
meaning greater than or equal to 200
Answer:
To determine whether someone can solve these questions, we would need to know more about the questions themselves and the person's background in the subject. Without that information, we cannot provide a clear and definitive answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking whether someone can solve questions 11, 12, 13, and 14. The answer options are "a) Yes" and "b) No."
In this case, since we don't have any specific questions or information about what the questions are, it is impossible to provide a definitive answer. The answer will depend on the person's knowledge and abilities in the subject.
If the person has the necessary knowledge and skills to solve the questions, then the answer would be "a) Yes." However, if the person does not have the knowledge or skills required to solve the questions, then the answer would be "b) No."
To determine whether someone can solve these questions, we would need to know more about the questions themselves and the person's background in the subject. Without that information, we cannot provide a clear and definitive answer.
(10x+20y+10z)
Answer:
I think the answer is 40.
Step-by-step explanation:
The three numbers to multiply to get 63 is A = 3 x 3 x 7
Given data ,
Let the number be represented as A
where the value of A = 63
Let the three numbers be represented as a , b , c
where the a , b , c are the factors of A
The factorization of the number 63 will be the three numbers to multiply to get the number 63
So , prime factorization of 63 is: 3 x 3 x 7
Hence , the three numbers are 3 , 3 and 7
To learn more about factorization click :
#SPJ2
= 3
why is this incorrect?
Let x represent , then you can rewrite the expression as 3x - x.
3x - x = 2x. Now replace "x" with and you get 2.
The reason 3 is incorrect is because you are supposed to perform the operation (+, -, x, ÷) with the coefficients, not with the variable or radical.
Algebraically, you have to factor the square root of 7 to see why you're wrong:
Conceptually, think that any object - say an apple - represents the square root of seven.
So, you have three apples, and you take away one apple. You have two apples remaining, i.e.