Answer: Canada
Explanation:
Answer:
Canada
Explanation:
By a 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ordered a stop to the recount in Florida and gave the election to George W. Bush.
B.
The House of Representatives and the Senate split over who had actually won the popular vote.
C.
Al Gore's supporters argued that absentee ballots from white voters in Texas had not been counted.
D.
George W. Bush's supporters claimed that he had won the popular vote in Oregon but lost the electoral vote.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The controversies surrounding the 2000 presidential election were that by a 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ordered a stop to the recount in Florida and gave the election to George W. Bush.
Explanation:
The 2000 US presidential election was held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000.
The polls were dominated by the post-election woes of the two main candidates, Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush, who had to wait for the results of the state of Florida, determinants of the final result, for more than a month. Bush won Florida with 537 votes in advance. These results were contested by the Democratic candidate before the Florida Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. The latter considered in Bush v. Gore December 12, 2000 that the recount ordered by the Supreme Court of Florida was unconstitutional by 7 votes to 2 and, by 5 votes against 4, that it was impossible to perform a constitutional recount within the time prescribed by the Constitution of the United State. It canceled the final manual recount of votes still taking place in Miami-Dade County, de facto nominating George W. Bush as the winner of the presidential election. Private recounts conducted in 2001 by a consortium of several US newspapers and the University of Chicago showed that if the specific recount called by Al Gore in the three counties had been successful, it could not have reversed the trend favorable to Bush, while a recount of the entire state of Florida would have championed the democrat Al Gore.
land belongs to state
no wages paid
free social services
freedom of religion
private businesses allowed
The correct answers are A) classless society. B) land belongs to the state. D) free social services.
Some aspects of the communist philosophy are a classless society, the land belongs to the state, and free social services.
In the Communist system, the means of production belong to the state. There is no private property in a Communist system. The government decides what to produce, how much to produce, at what price, and when to produce. Workers receive monthly stipends from the government for their work.
Answer:
-free social services
-classless society
-land belongs to state
Explanation:
got it right on odyssey :)
Answer:
Because the Catholics were frustrated that to many people in half of Germany wanted to be Protestant, and they couldn't really have power over them so they decided to not to expose the South (who they had power over) to the North (protestant) who had more freedom.