Answer:
27.76% probability that a randomly selected bag of this size has 10 or more green candies
Step-by-step explanation:
I am going to use the normal approximation to the binomial to solve this question.
Binomial probability distribution
Probability of exactly x sucesses on n repeated trials, with p probability.
Can be approximated to a normal distribution, using the expected value and the standard deviation.
The expected value of the binomial distribution is:
The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is:
Normal probability distribution
Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.
In a set with mean and standard deviation , the zscore of a measure X is given by:
The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.
When we are approximating a binomial distribution to a normal one, we have that , .
In this problem, we have that:
So
What is the probability that a randomly selected bag of this size has 10 or more green candies
Using continuity correction, this is , which is 1 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 9.5. So
has a pvalue of 0.7224
1 - 0.7224 = 0.2776
27.76% probability that a randomly selected bag of this size has 10 or more green candies
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The number x of green candies in a bag of 40 candies follows a binomial distribution, because we have:
So, the probability that in a bag of 40 candies, x are green is calculated as:
Replacing, n by 40 and p by 0.2, we get:
So, the probability that a randomly selected bag of this size has 10 or more green candies is equal to:
Where
So, we can calculated P(0) and P(1) as:
At the same way, we can calculated P(2), P(3), P(4), P(5), P(6), P(7), P(8) and P(9) and get that P(x<10) is equal to:
Finally, the probability that a randomly selected bag of this size has 10 or more green candies is:
Answer:
Never want to give you up
Step-by-step explanation:
Brainliest? pls
Famous Dex - Pick It Up (Lyrics) feat. A$AP Rocky
My ordinary life
SoFaygo - Knock Knock
Streets
D !ck
4:32
32:8
24:64
32:128
Answer:
32:128
Step-by-step explanation:
divide all of it by 2, you get 16:64. Again, 8:32. Again, 4:16
Answer:
19
Step-by-step explanation:
1st day: x
2nd day: x+3
3rd day: x+4
Equation: x+(x+3)+(x+4)=64
3x+7=64
3x=57
x=19
I hope you found this answer helpful!!!!!!(sorry if instructions aren't clear)
Answer:
0.94 cents
Step-by-step explanation:
If you multiply 0.67 with 141 you will see that you will end up with the same answer as above.
0.666 estimates to 0.67
Use rules of inference to prove that the following conclusion follows from these hypotheses:
C : ∃x (p(x) ∧ r(x))
Clearly label the inference rules used at every step of your proof.
2. Consider the following hypotheses:
H1 : ∀x (¬C(x) → ¬A(x)) H2 : ∀x (A(x) → ∀y B(y)) H3 : ∃x A(x)
Use rules of inference to prove that the following conclusion follows from these hypotheses:
C : ∃x (B(x) ∧ C(x))
Clearly label the inference rules used at every step of your proof.
3. Consider the following predicate quantified formula:
∃x ∀y (P (x, y) ↔ ¬P (y, y))
Prove the unsatisfiability of this formula using rules of inference.
Answer:
See deductions below
Step-by-step explanation:
1)
a) p(y)∧q(y) for some y (Existencial instantiation to H1)
b) q(y) for some y (Simplification of a))
c) q(y) → r(y) for all y (Universal instatiation to H2)
d) r(y) for some y (Modus Ponens using b and c)
e) p(y) for some y (Simplification of a)
f) p(y)∧r(y) for some y (Conjunction of d) and e))
g) ∃x (p(x) ∧ r(x)) (Existencial generalization of f)
2)
a) ¬C(x) → ¬A(x) for all x (Universal instatiation of H1)
b) A(x) for some x (Existencial instatiation of H3)
c) ¬(¬C(x)) for some x (Modus Tollens using a and b)
d) C(x) for some x (Double negation of c)
e) A(x) → ∀y B(y) for all x (Universal instantiation of H2)
f) ∀y B(y) (Modus ponens using b and e)
g) B(y) for all y (Universal instantiation of f)
h) B(x)∧C(x) for some x (Conjunction of g and d, selecting y=x on g)
i) ∃x (B(x) ∧ C(x)) (Existencial generalization of h)
3) We will prove that this formula leads to a contradiction.
a) ∀y (P (x, y) ↔ ¬P (y, y)) for some x (Existencial instatiation of hypothesis)
b) P (x, y) ↔ ¬P (y, y) for some x, and for all y (Universal instantiation of a)
c) P (x, x) ↔ ¬P (x, x) (Take y=x in b)
But c) is a contradiction (for example, using truth tables). Hence the formula is not satisfiable.
StartRoot 5 y EndRoot
3 (RootIndex 3 StartRoot 5 x EndRoot)
y StartRoot 5 EndRoot
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
The like radical to the expression 3√5 is y√5, as both expressions have the square root index and the same radicand, which is 5.
The student is asking which radical expression is like the radical 3√5. Like radicals have the same index and radicand. The index is the degree of the root, and the radicand is the number under the radical sign. The expression 3√5 means 3 times the square root of 5, or in exponential form, 3 × 51/2. The like radical for 3√5 would also need to have a square root (index of 2) and the same radicand (5). Therefore, the like radical to 3√5 from the options provided would be y√5 because it has the same index (2) and radicand (5), only with a different coefficient (y instead of 3).
Additionally, expressing radicals as fractional exponents helps to identify like radicals. For example, using the property x² = √x we can understand that if we have the same base and exponent, we can consider the expressions to be like radicals. Hence, in this case, since both 3 and y are just coefficients, the root parts √5 are the same, making them like radicals.
#SPJ3