Answer:
correct option is a. $3,650,000
Explanation:
given data
Beginning capital = $3,500,000
Gross investment = $300,000
Depreciation = $150,000
solution
we get here first Net investment that is express as
Net investment = Gross investment - Depreciation ...............1
put here value and we get
Net investment = $300,000 - $150,000
Net investment = $150,000
and
Economy stock of capital at the end of the year will be as
Economy stock of capital = Beginning capital + Net investment
Economy stock of capital = $3,500,000 + $150,000
Economy stock of capital = $3,650,000
so correct option is a. $3,650,000
Answer:
This is influenced by raw materials and demand
Explanation:
The production of ice-cream is likely to be influenced by two main features:
1. the cost of raw materials or ingredients.
The cost of the ingredients influences the cost of production of the ice cream. If the price of the ingredients increases, the ice cream making company is likely to increase the price of the ice cream to cover the expenses of the increased price of ingredients.
2. demand in the ice cream - this is when the demand exceeds the supply of ice cream. In this way, the company might take advantage of the trend to increase the price and make more profits.
2. debit to Investments—Tetter Company Bonds for $52,000
3. debit to Investments—Tetter Company Bonds for $50,000
Answer:
Option (3) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
cost of purchasing Tetter Company's 12% bonds = $50,000
Accrued interest expense = $2,000
The journal entry is as follows:
On April 1,
Investments in debt securities - Tetter Company bonds A/c Dr. $50,000
Interest receivable A/c Dr. $2,000
To Cash $52,000
(To record the purchase of the bonds)
Answer: Option D
Explanation: The scope of providing better quality services in case of tax consultancy is quite difficult as the tax rates and rules are already set and there is little area for flexibility.
However, the manner of providing service could be changed maximizing the satisfaction of the customer or such areas of service could be covered which are not provided by the other firms.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Suppose in studying Climate Change we discover that in one country, deserts are going to be created where formerly there was grasslands and an abundance of water and in another place the coastlines are going to be altered. If you are an American, how do you think a politician is going to respond to such a problem.
Will his/her response be well thought out based on scientific preparedness, or will he (or she) grab onto the first solution suggestion to him/her and try and implement that?
Whatever he/she does, it will cost and everyone will be affected. A starting place is to find out what presidents in the past have done. During the Bush administration (the second Bush), there was an oil crisis. He responded by allocating more acreage to the growing of corn so supplementing oil production. Replaceable resources for non renewable ones. Sounded like a very good solution, but was it? As it turned out, no. He was robbing Peter to pay Paul. Thousands of people suffered (and died) with that decision because food is much more important than solving transportation problems at the expense of food.
The same is true here. If a solution is sought for global warming, politicians have to be well aware of what they are doing. And that has to be studied very carefully.
I am Not sure sorry:)