Answer;
-38 %
Explanation;
-Budget busters are the large potential problem areas that can destroy a budget. Failure to control even one of these problem areas can result in financial disaster.
-Housing takes about 38 percent of your monthly budget. Housing decisions should be based on need and financial ability, not on internal or external pressure.
-Food takes 12 percent of your monthly budget. The reduction of a family's food bill requires quantity and quality planning.
-Transportation (purchase and maintenance), takes 15 percent of your monthly budget, Debts takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income, Insurance takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income assuming an employer provides medical insurance, Recreation/Entertainment takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income, Clothing takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income, Medical and dental takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income and Savings takes 5 percent of Net Spendable Income.
B) far outperforms the overall market, suggesting that stockbrokers provide valuable services.
C) does not outperform the overall market.
D) does not outperform the overall market, suggesting that stockbrokers do not provide services of any value
Answer:
C) does not outperform the overall market
Explanation:
Technical analysis is a method used to predict future price movements in financial markets by analyzing historical price patterns and market trends. It is based on the belief that past price behavior can provide insights into future price movements. However, numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of technical analysis, and the majority of these studies have found that it does not consistently outperform the overall market. This suggests that the use of technical analysis as a standalone strategy may not provide a significant advantage in terms of generating higher returns compared to simply investing in the overall market.
Tests for technical analysis show it may not outperform the overall market, which isn't indicative of stockbrokers providing no value. Stockbrokers offer diverse services beyond technical analysis, such as wealth and tax management. Other forms of investment analysis like fundamental analysis can also be useful.
The student's question deals with the concept of technical analysis in finance and investment. Technical analysis is a method investors use to study past market data, primarily price and volume, to predict future price movements of an asset, in this case, stocks.
According to the query, performance tests suggest that technical analysis does not outperform the overall market. This implies that even with the rules developed through technical analysis, the returns may not be significantly greater than simply investing in the market as a whole, such as purchasing an index fund.
However, this does not necessarily mean that stockbrokers provide no value. Stockbrokers offer various services including advice on wealth management, tax planning, retirement planning, and more. Moreover, there are other types of investment analysis, such as fundamental analysis, which some investors might find more useful than technical analysis.
#SPJ11
The South African Congress of Nonprofit Organizations (SACONO) focuses on the anti xenophobia imbizo in Orlando, Johannesburg to evaluate modalities of re-integrating foreigners who were recently attacked by locals for supposedly grabbing jobs and imposing businesses targeted by the locals.
Firm 1 will be given a quota of 692.31 units, and Firm 2 will be given a quota of 307.69 units.
To determine how the government agency will divide the 1000 units of pollution between the two firms, we need to consider their marginal costs of pollution abatement and the constraint that their combined pollution cannot exceed 1000 units.
Let's solve for the optimal allocation using the given marginal cost functions:
1. Set up the optimization problem:
Maximize total pollution abatement subject to the constraint:
x₁ + x₂ ≤ 1000
2. Determine the marginal cost functions for each firm:
Firm 1's marginal cost of pollution abatement: c₁(x₁) = 6000.00 + 4.00x₁
Firm 2's marginal cost of pollution abatement: c₂(x₂) = 1500.00 + 8.00x₂
3. Formulate the objective function:
Maximize c₁(x₁) + c₂(x₂)
4. Solve the optimization problem using the given constraint:
Subject to x₁ + x₂ ≤ 1000
By substituting the marginal cost functions, the problem becomes:
Maximize (6000.00 + 4.00x₁) + (1500.00 + 8.00x₂)
Subject to x₁ + x₂ ≤ 1000
5. Solve the optimization problem to find the optimal allocation:
By solving the problem, we find that x₁ ≈ 692.31 and x₂ ≈ 307.69.
Therefore, the government agency will allocate a quota of approximately 692.31 units to Firm 1 and a quota of approximately 307.69 units to Firm 2 to ensure that the combined pollution does not exceed 1000 units.
The complete question is:
Two firms operate in a manufacturing industry that generates a significant amount of pollution. The local government has decided to crack down and limit the total amount of pollution to 1000 units. Each firm has a different cost of cleaning up its production process. Firm 1's marginal cost of pollution abatement is c₁(x₁) = 6000.00 +4.00 x₁ and firm 2's marginal cost of abatement is C₂(x₂) = 1500.00+ 8.00(x₂), where x₁ and x₂ are the amounts of pollution emitted by each firm. The two firms are constrained to produce no more than the 1000 units of pollution combined. 1st attempt See Hint
Suppose that a government agency is able to estimate the pollution abatement equations and set quotas for each firm. How will it divide up the 1000 units of pollution between the two? Give all answers to two decimals.
Firm 1 will be given a quota of____ units and firm 2 will be given a quota of ___units.
To know more about marginal costs, refer here:
brainly.com/question/30099644
#SPJ11
B)The scientific method can help develop accurate models even when data are unavailable.
C)The scientific method may not reveal a "true" model of the world.
D)The scientific method does not require the models to be tested with data.
Answer:
The answer is: C) The scientific method may not reveal a "true" model of the world.
Explanation:
When economists and scientists use the scientific method they are trying to develop models of the world and then test them with data. Past data is used to try to predict future economic behavior. That doesn´t mean that those models are 100% accurate and true, but rather that they might (or not) apply to specific situations.
Microeconomics relies on the use of the scientific method and econometrics, while the scientific method is not applicable in macroeconomics.
Among the options, the true statement is option C: The scientific method may not reveal a 'true' model of the world. The scientific method is meant to minimize bias and enhance result reliability, but that doesn't mean it always reveals the 'true' model of the world, as models can change with new data or perspectives.
Among the statements provided, option C) The scientific method may not reveal a "true" model of the world is true. The scientific method uses a systematic approach to answer questions and understand phenomenon. It's meant to reduce bias and increase the reliability of results, but that does not mean it always reveals an absolute or 'true' model of the world. Scientific models are inherently simplifications of the real world, and they can change as new data or perspectives come to light.
#SPJ6
Answer:A
Explanation:
The correct answer is the
Federal Trade Commission
:)