How were Ronald Reagan's Cold War policies different from those of previous presidents?O
A. Reagan engaged in brinksmanship, while other presidents preferred a more distant, removed
approach
B. Reagan believed in a smaller military, while other presidents engaged in an escalating arms
race.
C. Reagan favored military engagement, while other presidents avoided it after losing the Vietnam
War
D. Reagan argued for better relations with Latin America, while other presidents avoided these
countries

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Reagan's Cold War policies differed from previous presidents' C. Reagan favored military engagement, while other presidents avoided it after losing Vietnam War.

What is Reagan's Cold War policy toward the Soviet Union?

Reagan favored a military build-up to overtake the Soviet powers.

Therefore, Reagan was committed to the arms race by raising military spending by 43%.

Thus, Reagan's Cold War policies differed from previous presidents' C. Reagan favored military engagement, while other presidents avoided it after losing Vietnam War.

Learn more about Ronald Reagan's Cold War Policies at brainly.com/question/1042201

#SPJ2


Related Questions

PLEASE ANSWER QUICKwhich of the following is an example of a limit to execute power under the ConstitutionA. the Congress fails to override a vote B. the president signs a bill into law C. the Supreme Court makes a ruling D. the Senate rejects a Justice nominee
Chronological orderCharlemagne crowned Holy Roman EmperorChooseCortes's Army Conquers Artec EmpireChooseThe Council of Trent[Choose)Vasco da Gama Reaches India[ChooseOttomans Siege ViennaChoose+Martin Luther posts his Ninety-Five ThesesChooseMagna Carta>ChooseReign of Charles VChoose)Avignon PapacyChoose).Plague of JustinianChoose
What body of water is indicated by #7?Euphrates RiverNile RiverTigris RiverPersian Gulf
Who led a rebellion in Virginia in 1676?A) William Berkeley B) John Locke C) James OglethorpeD) Nathaniel Bacon
I need help with this ASAP plz can someone help me!!

What were the causes and consequences of sherman's and grant's turn toward total war in the conquest of the south? was sherman's aim of destroying southern civilian morale a fundamentally immoral one? in what ways is it fair to call the civil war "the first modern war"?

Answers

The implementation of total war was a strategy picked by the Union officers for multiple reasons.

1) Total war will result in the destruction of Southern supplies and transportation. Sherman destroys railroad tracks, burns crops, and ruins plantations so that the Southern army/citizens have no resources to survive.

2) It will bring the Civil War to an end much quicker.

Sherman's idea of destroying the South can be viewed as an immoral action. This is due to the fact that Sherman and his troops will be destroying the land and property of individuals who may not even be part of the war or the Confederate war effort.

What was the American Revolution?

Answers

Answer:

go in Google and search it up

What is one way a command economy affects the lives of private citizens?O Citizens cannot make most economic decisions.
O Citizens can only work in factories or on farms.
O Citizens must pay for their own health care.
O Citizens have limited access to education.

Answers

As a result of the heavy government interference present in a Command economy, Citizens cannot make most economic decisions.

A Command economy works such that:

  • The government controls all the means of production
  • The government decides what should be produced
  • The government is the largest and only employer

The government controls everything economic in a command economy which means that the citizens cannot make independent economic decisions and need to rely on the government.

In conclusion, a command economy leads to citizens not be able to make economic decisions.

Find out more at brainly.com/question/14878598.

Answer:

A. Citizens cannot make most economic decisions

Explanation:

The need for slavery in the Southern Colonies became an economic fact because indentured servants eventually lefttheir jobs on the plantations, leaving a void in the job market.
... true or false?

Answers

I think the answer should be true

In korematsu vs united States the federal exclusion order forced japanese Americans into relocation camps was deemed constitutional because it was issued under

Answers

The correct answer is:  because it was issued under special circumstances during wartime.

Korematsu v. United States  ( 1944 ) was a landmark Supreme Court decision concerning the execution of Executive Order 9066. This order ordered Japanese Americans into interment camps due to suspicions of espionage and their engagement against the United States.

The Court ruled that the need to protect the country against espionage outweighed the rights of Americans of Japanese descent, such as Fred Korematsu.

According to the Justices, Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of his race but because the United States was at was with the Japanese Empire and the order was a way to protect America.

wartime conditions is your answer my good sir 

Which did settler bring to American Indians land in West​

Answers

European Arrival The earliest French and English these tribes encountered were not settlers competing for lands fur trappers and traders. They brought with them manufactured goods — blankets, cookware, knives, guns — to exchange for beaver, deer and other skins that sold for high prices in Europe.