Cartels, monopolies, trusts, and horizontal and vertical integration all share the goal of increasing profits. What was a step by the federal government to limit the power of corporations? What argument supports the perception of the big business leaders as \"captains of industry\"?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: Cartels, monopolies, trusts, and horizontal and vertical integration all share the goal of increasing profits. The step by the federal government to limit the power of corporations is the Sherman Antitrust Act. The argument that supports the perception of the big business leaders as "captains of industry" is that the support for technology benefits the economy.  

Related Questions

If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority, he or she gets to write the
Once the powder keg was ignited, what made it difficult to stop the chain of events that led to all-out war in Europe in 1914? Question 5 options: A. Nations responded to threats to their allies by mobilizing their militaries. B. The policy of isolationism followed by European nations had been largely ignored by 1914. C. European leaders believed a war in Europe would revive their struggling economies. D. A quick, reliable system of communication was not available to foreign ministers.
The U.S. maintained an embargo against Vietnam until _____. 1974 1984 1994 2004
What was one criticism of the Vietnam-era draft system?It disproportionately affected working class young men and African Americans. It unfairly prevented college students from pursuing their educations. It applied only to young U.S. men and not to young U.S. women. It gave too much control over deferments to federal rather than local officials.
Which of these statements describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century?a. it was fate that the united states would continue to expand westwardb. the united states should invade europe and take control of that continentc. the united states did not need to expand because it had enough landd. it was necessary for the united states to sell some of its land in order to raise money.

Horace Bushnell is associated with which idea? A. religious liberalism B. religious fundamentalism C. religious intolerance D. religious liberty

Answers

The correct option is A

Horace Bushnell was an American congregational minister and theologian. He criticized the prevailing conceptions of the Trinity, the atonement, the conversion, and the relations of the natural and the supernatural. Above all, he broke with the prevailing view that theology was regarded as essentially intellectual in its attractiveness and demonstrable by processes of exact logical deduction.

  • He virtually opposed revivalism and effectively directed the flow of Christian thought toward the young.
  • He endeavored to elevate the natural to the supernatural by emphasizing the supernatural nature of man.
  • Development of the moral vision of atonement as opposed to governmental and penal theories or satisfaction
Horace Bushnell is associated with religious liberalism. He freed mainstream Protestant theology from its Puritan scholasticism and established the basis for religious liberalism!

Name one characteristic of democracy

Answers

A characteristic is freedom. =)
The people get to choose their own leader / vote.

Why did Plains farming tribes normally settle in regions along rivers in eastern Oklahoma?

Answers

huge us insufficiency

Answer:

These regions had fertile floodplains.

Explanation:

What ideology in American society is related to liberty for Alexis de Tocqueville?free education
laissez-faire
separation of church and state
fair wage compensation

Answers

Laissez-faire is the ideology in American society related to liberty for Alexis de Tocqueville. Laissez-faire is the policy of leaving things to take their own course, without interfering.

Final answer:

Alexis de Tocqueville, a French historian, associated the ideology of laissez-faire with 'liberty' in American society. Laissez-faire is an economic principle advocating for minimal government interference in business and the economy, aligning with American values of individual liberty and freedom of choice.

Explanation:

The ideology in American society that's most associated with 'liberty' for Alexis de Tocqueville is laissez-faire. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French political thinker and historian, famously recognized and commented on this principle during his observations of American society in the 19th century.

The term laissez-faire, derived from French, literally translates to 'let do' or 'let go'. In economic theory, it refers to a system where the government does not interfere with business practices or market forces, arguing that natural economic systems are most efficient when allowed to govern themselves. The idea is anchored in notions of individual liberty and freedom of choice, principles that have been fundamental to American ideology, particularly during the time of Tocqueville's tour.

Learn more about laissez-faire here:

brainly.com/question/23946713

#SPJ12

Which amendment would strict constructionists look to in order to justify a limited of constitution?A. 8th Amendment
B.10th Amendment
C.14th Amendment
D.25th Amendment

Answers

The answer is B.10th Amendment 

Can somoene help me with this question??How might the history of the U.S. have been different if the original thirteen states had been guaranteed a perpetual majority of the representation in Congress?

Answers

It cannot be guaranteed that the history of United States would have been any different if the original thirteen states had been guaranteed a perpetual majority of the representation in Congress. Probably the revolution could have been delayed, but the revolution definitely would have happened. At that time the colonists always were angry whenever something did not happen as per their expectation. The colonists always had a tendency of asking more than they had and this would only have been possible if the colonists had their own country.   



Since the 13 colonies were colonies, they would have eventually revolted against the British rule, like how the rest of the British colonies. If they gave them more representation, then the revolution would have only been delayed, but at the end there would still be a revolution and the creation of the United States of America.