Answer:
Explanation:
1. Determine the total compensation cost pertaining to the stock option plan:-
Estimated fair value per option $2
X Option granted 40 million
Total compensation $ 80 million
b. 7 days, 5 workers
c. 5 days, 7 workers
d. 8 days, 3 workers
Answer: c. 5 days, 7 workers
Explanation: With the project requirements provided, and with the least of number of resources working on the task not less than the number of those assigned to the task.
The least amount of time for the project to complete would be approximately 5 days, and the resources needed to complete the task would be approximately 7 workers.
Answer: Formal training is an integral part of employee development. It helps employee to get introduced to the nature of the job.
a) It makes clear to the workers what the employer needs, without which workers may not understand which work should be done on priority basis.
b) It eliminates waste of resources like time, money, etc. If a work is done without any formal training, such work might not be in desired standard; this thing is the waste of money as well as time. Therefore, in order to prevent it the formal training is required.
In rudimentary terms, every firm depends on its workforce to a great extent. After all, it is the people that run the operations of the company.
The employer that provide training to their employees see the following benefits:
Greater productivity,better cooperation,continuous growth of employees
and enhanced job satisfaction.
Cultural competence
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
Answer:
Yes but only $90,000
Explanation:
Supplies 7, 800
Answer: Debit Supplies and Credit Cash
Explanation: From the above question, Wiley paid cash for the supplies and in accounting you debit the receiver and credit the giver.
In the question above, the supplies account is receiving value while the cash is giving value. Then the right journal entry is to Debit supplies and credit cash.
Answer:
No, I do not think justices should be forced to retire.
Explanation:
In order to ensure that the rule of law is maintained and every arm of government and it's institutions has no influences on justices, justices should not be forced to retire, as long as they are of good behavior and conduct.
The question pertains to the argument of whether the tenure of Supreme Court justices in a democracy should be capped or not. The professor's comment implies that long tenure might hinder dynamic legal interpretations in line with evolving societal values. Whether one supports the traditional life appointment system for justices or not depends on personal perspective.
The law professor's statement likely implies that with the evolving socially progressive landscape, having Supreme Court justices serve for 25 years or more could lead to stagnation in legal interpretation and decision making. Whether the current life appointment system for justices should be changed or not is a matter of personal opinion. Supporters of the current system often argue that it preserves judicial independence and protects the court from political pressures. On the other hand, those in favor of imposing retirement ages for justices often cite the need for fresh perspectives and dynamic legal interpretations that align with current societal values.
#SPJ3