Answer:
The parenthesis always
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
you would use the distributive property of multiplication.
Step-by-step explanation:
2+3(x+1)=6x
2+3x+3=6x
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to answer this question first we have to convert g(x) into vertex form.
Now from this form we can visualize the transformations made to f(x) to get the graph of g(x).
Addition of 2 in x means that graph of f(x) = x2 is shifted 1 unit to left to get (x + 1)² .
Addition of 5 in the function value indicates that the graph is shifted 5 units up.
So the changes which have been made to f(x) in order to get g(x) are:
The result after decreasing 180 by 12.5% of its value is 157.5
A percentage is a number or ratio expressed as a fraction of 100.
Subtraction is an arithmetic operation that represents the operation of removing objects from a collection.
Given,
The value = 180
12.5% of 180 =
Subtraction
180 - 22.5 = 157.5
Hence, the result after decreasing 180 by 12.5% of its value is 157.5
Learn more about Percentage and Subtraction here
#SPJ2
Answer:
The answer is £157.5.
Step-by-step explanation:
Another way of decreasing by a percentage is to increase by that percentages compliment.
Since 100-12.5 = 87.5%. We can increase 180 by 87.5% to get the same result.
0.875*180 = 157.5
----------------------------------------|
pickles | $0.20 per oz. |
bread | $0.75 per loaf |
coffee | $2.05 per pound |
----------------------------------------
Darryl places an order for 128 ounces of pickles, 24 loaves of bread, and 25 pounds of coffee. What is the total cost of the order?
please hurry!
Answer:
94.85
i hope this helps you !
B Yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood
C No, this is not a valid inference because she only asked 25 families
D No, this is not a valid inference because she did not take a random sample of the neighborhood
Answer
Yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
Step-by-step explanation:
As we can see that Sue's survey was non biased and completely random.
She found that 18% of the families would volunteer to help at the shelter. She claims that 18% of the neighborhood families would be expected to to help at the animal shelter.
So, yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
Answer:
the answer is B Yes, this is a valid inference because she took a random sample of the neighborhood.
Step-by-step explanation: