Which of the following are not negotiable instruments?A) Certified cheque B) Cheques C) Promissory note D) Bill of sale

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

Che ques are not generally negotiable instruments in California. If you are talking about another state then the answer may vary.

Explanation:


Related Questions

Is the United state ready for a woman president?.
Who was the first hispanic to serve on the supreme court
Who led the argument before the supreme court in the brown v. Board of education case and later became a supreme court justice?
Jamie wanted to find out if the majority of people in Texas favored the death penalty. So, he surveyed 25 students in his criminal justice class and found that 85% of them strongly supported the death penalty. Jamie therefore concluded that Texans strongly support the death penalty. Which of the following is trueJamie's conclusion is not strongly supported based on her research
Es un organismo Humanitario imparcial de carácter internacional que ofrece sus servicios a las partes en conflicto armado, protegiendo a las victimas de la guerra y de la violencia interna.

Question 7 of 10Which situation would allow a country to increase the goods it imports
despite spending the same amount of money?
A. The country's government approved an increase in its trade deficit.
B. The country's currency experienced a major decline in interest
rates
C. The inflation rate of the country's currency increased
D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased

Answers

If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, the import increases while spending same amount.

So, option D. is correct.

Define import.

An import is a product or service purchased in one country but made in the other. Import is among the most important aspects of international trade.

If the nation's currency's exchange rate rose, it would help the country to import more items while spending the very same amount of money.

So, option D. is correct.

Find out more information about import here:

brainly.com/question/14099397?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

D. The exchange rate for the country's currency increased

Explanation:

a p e ex

After a long illness, your uncle dies. He leaves a sizeable estate but no will is found for several weeks. Finally, one of his ex-wives appears with a document she claims to be a valid will. It shows her and her children by him receiving most of his property. Your parents and the deceased's other children contest the will. Should the federal or state courts handle this case? Why? Which court in which system is most likely to hear it?

Answers

Answer:

I write this letter to talk to you about your nephew Jhonny and to emphasize the importance of having you as a support for his academic life.

As you may already know, Jhonny is a spectacular teenager who shows a strong talent for English and literature classes, although he has difficulties in other subjects, which is normal for most young people. We all believe that Jhonny has a bright future ahead of him, but unfortunately he has no resources of his own to move forward with his dreams, needing a lot of your support.

You more than I know that Jhonny cannot count on his parents to support his studies, since you are the closest and most important relative in this regard. Adult support is highly important for academic development and a promising future professional life.

I am sure that Jhonny is very grateful for everything you do for him and is very sad and shaken by the possibility of losing his support, but he has difficulties in telling you, which motivates me to write this letter.

I appreciate your understanding and hope that I have managed to change your opinion.

Kind regards,

Agatha Melly.

Explanation:

Final answer:

When a person dies without a will, their assets are distributed based on state intestacy laws. The state courts would handle a will contest in this scenario, and the court in the state where the deceased person resided would likely hear the case.

Explanation:

When a person dies without a will, it is referred to as dying intestate. In such cases, the court will distribute the assets based on state intestacy laws. Each state has its own set of laws that determine who will receive the property. In this scenario, where your uncle's ex-wife claims to have a valid will, it would be up to the state courts to handle the case.

State courts have jurisdiction over probate matters, including will contests. They have the authority to determine the validity of the will and decide how the estate should be distributed. The court in the state where your uncle resided at the time of his death would be the most likely to hear the case.

Learn more about intestacy laws here:

brainly.com/question/27896050

#SPJ12

If the police arrive at Larrys office without probable cause or a warrant and demand to search the premises, which amendment protects him from this type of search?

Answers

Answer:

the 4th amendment.

Answer:

the fourth amendment

True or False? Police coldly and strictly uphold the law, ignoring their emotional and personal judgement.

Answers

In most cases, yes, they can’t let their emotions blind them from what has to be done, if they be bias then they could be fired or that one person could commit another crime. That’s why police are so cold.

Hope this clears things up

✨SammySilkWorm waz here✨
True because it is your job as an officer to look at the facts and then base your judgment off of that.

Which amendment protects the media's right to watch over and influence the
government?

Answers

Answer:

The First Admenment

Explanation:

The First Amendment permits information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

How has the supreme court’s original interpretation of the right to privacy changed because of griswold and roe?

Answers

Answer:

Hi im Sergeant von im here too help!!.The Supreme Court's original interpretation of the right to privacy has changed because of Griswold and Roe by increasing and expanding the right to privacy. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life. Hope this answer helps.

Answer: This was the sample response

The Supreme Court has increased or expanded the right to privacy. Originally, the right applied to the privacy of one's own thoughts and the freedom to be left alone. After the landmark cases Griswold and Roe, privacy then included the right to control one's own body and family and home life.

Explanation: