Answer and Explanation:
I've read somewhere that holding on to anger is like holding an ember with your hands to throw it at someone else. You end up burning yourself before you can even hurt the other person. I believe the quote in the question conveys essentially the same meaning. Holding anger serves no good purpose, nor does it bring any benefits.
I have been offended and mistreated several times during my life. Until not long ago, I had chosen to hold on to anger, constantly reminding myself of the offense and, consequently, living resentful. That has obviously - and very predictably - taken its toll on me. It became harder for me to keep my emotions under control. Every time I found myself facing a situation that resembled those previous ones, my brain and body would immediately react, as if an alarm had been activated inside me. I would get angry so fast, I didn't even see it coming. I would end up overreacting, being rude to the other person in a desperate measure to defend myself, my ego, my feelings. It turns out that was not a good tactic. Only recently I chose to learn and understand that forgiving and letting go of anger was the solution. It is not an easy task, and I haven't changed overnight. But I got myself together. Now, I take my time to breath, and then let go. Many of the problems and situations that would normally bother me have no effect on me whatsoever, leaving much room to happiness, calm, and relaxation.
Note: feel free to adapt this according to your own life experiences.
Answer:
The Byzantine Empire, the Muslim Empire, and the Western Empire.
Explanation:
:)
b. Jules Dupuit
c. Karl Marx
d. John Maynard Keynes
Answer:
The candidate's disagreements on education issues
Explanation:
In the 2016 election, Chloe voted for the first time.
She was well informed about the issues and debates of the Presidential candidates. She reads newspaper regularly to keep her updated on election issues.
Chloe is highly motivated and she watches the presidential debates in the televisions between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. While watching and listening carefully to their debates, Chloe is more likely to pay attention to the candidate's disagreements on the education issues being a student herself.
Chloe, a student, is highly motivated about the education issues that candidates are debating.
Thus the answer is
The candidate's disagreements on education issues
Chloe likely paid attention to factors such as the candidates' policies, values, standpoints, and demographic traits during the 2016 presidential debates. The candidates' policies and previous public service were also important considerations due to her informed approach to the elections.
Given Chloe's high level of motivation and informed approach to the 2016 elections, it's very likely that she paid keen attention to factors such as the candidates' policies, the issues raised during the debates, and their respective values and standpoints. As someone reading newspapers and watching the debates, she was likely not just looking at their personality traits, but also at their proposed policies and their stand on issues important to her such as education, health care, economy, etc.
For instance, Chloe might have been guided by her own demographic, therefore, considering factors such as gender and age. Perhaps she felt drawn to Hillary Clinton as the first woman nominee from a major party. Alternatively, she might've focused on policies, considering elements like Bernie Sanders' promise for free college tuition. The candidates' background and previous public service also mattered quite likely: Donald Trump, a well-known business tycoon and TV personality, versus Hillary Clinton, a former First Lady, senator, and Secretary of State.
In conclusion, Chloe's approach indicates she was likely to pay attention to a combination of demographic traits, political values, and policy proposals when watching the 2016 presidential debates.
#SPJ11
b. farming and heavy industry
c. shipping and transportation
d. manufacturing, service and technology industries, and agriculture
The answer is D
manufacturing, service and technology industries, and agriculture
hope this helps
Answer:
True
Explanation:
"Artificial Trans fat" is banned in United States. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states in 2015 that artificial trans fats is unsafe to consume. It is linked largely to many heart diseases. They gave all the food-makers three years to remove trans-fat from all their food supplies. The deadline was June 18, 2018. Earlier in January 2006, FDA had ordered the food companies to disclose the amount of trans fat being used in their food supplies. Thus, this is a true statement.