Answer:
$2,034,500 ; A
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to calculate cost estimate.
One of the methods which we can use to do this is the cost factor technique.
Mathematically, the estimated total cost will be;
Ct = hCe
Where Ce refers to cost at major equipment and h is the overall cost factor.
From the question, we can identify the following;
Ce is $650,000 while h = 1.82 + 1 + 0.31 = 3.13
Inputing these values in the formula, we have;
Ct = $650,000 * 3.13 = $2,034,500
Answer:
a) 2, 034,500
Explanation:
the explanation is given in the file attached
b.$113,300.
c.$83,839.
d.$198,339.
e.$68,970.
Answer:
a.$16,370.
Explanation:
beginning WIP cost: 11,100
cost added during the period
materials 77,100
direct labor 25,100
overhead 70% of DL = 17,570
total added 119,770
Total cost to be accounted for: 130,870
Cost assignned to
transferred out 114,500
ending WIP 16.370
Total cost assigned to 130,870
As the cost to be accounted and the cost assigned to should match we contruct that and solve for the ending WIP
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Department A:
Direct labor cost= $60,000
Manufacturing overhead= $90,000
Department B:
Manufacturing overhead= $45,000
Machine-hours= 2,000
To calculate the predetermined manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Department A:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 90,000/60,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $1.5 per direct labor dollar
Department B:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 45,000/2,000= $22.4 per machine-hour
(B) government policies to help promote a stagnant economy
(C) providing tax breaks to firms that engage in technological innovations
(D) interviewing a wide variety of candidates to ensure a diverse workforce
(E) government policies to limit outsourcing of jobs
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the unemployment which occurs due to the employees shifting and moving from one job to another. This kind of unemployment is unavoidable and exist in every economy to some extent.
A website that advertises job will be helpful to employees for gaining information and awareness about new openings.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option A.
Frictional unemployment could be reduced by enhancing job visibility, promoting economic growth, and limiting outsourcing. The best options for this are advertising job openings widely, implementing government policies to promote a stagnant economy, and creating policies to limit job outsourcing.
Frictional unemployment refers to the period of time when a worker is searching for, or transitioning from one job to another. It's a natural form of unemployment due to factors like workers' voluntary decisions to change jobs or the time lag involved in finding a new job.
Options (A) Websites that advertise job openings across the country, (B) Government policies to help promote a stagnant economy, and (E) Government policies to limit outsourcing of jobs would help reduce the amount of frictional unemployment. (A) would increase the visibility of job opportunities, enabling job seekers to find new roles more quickly. (B) would stimulate economic growth, creating more job opportunities. (E) would keep jobs within the country, increasing local employment opportunities.
#SPJ3
A. $20,000
B. $15,060
C. $12,500
D. $10,000
Answer: $15,060
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Ben and Jerry were shareholders of Water Ice Inc., an S corp. On Jan. 1, 1998, Ben owned 40 shares and Jerry owned 60 shares.
We are further told that Ben sold his shares to Joe for $10,000 on March 31, 1998 and that the corp. reported a $50,000 loss at the end of 1998. The loss that will be allocated to Joe will be:
= $50,000 × 40% × 9/12
= $50,000 × 0.4 × 0.75
= $15,000
The closest figure we have close to that is $15,060 which is option B
b. Only CPF solutions can be optimal, so the number of optimal solutions cannot exceed the number of CPF solutions.
c. If multiple optimal solutions exist, then an optimal CPF solu-tion may have an adjacent CPF solution that also in optimal.
Answer and Explanation:
a. The given statement is true as the corner point at the objective function should be feasible solution which is no longer as compared with the value for every adjacent CPF solution as compared with its optimal
b. The given statement is false as the solution can be an edge
c. The given statement is true as it shows the direct relation between the two things
In linear programming problems, CPF solutions can be optimal and if multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal.
a. True: For minimization problems, if the objective function evaluated at a CPF solution is no larger than its value at every adjacent CPF solution, then that solution is optimal. This is because in a minimization problem, the goal is to find the solution that minimizes the objective function.
b. True: Only CPF solutions can be optimal, so the number of optimal solutions cannot exceed the number of CPF solutions. CPF stands for Corner-Point Feasible, which means solutions that lie on the corner points of the feasible region.
c. False: If multiple optimal solutions exist, an optimal CPF solution may not have an adjacent CPF solution that is also optimal. This is because adjacent CPF solutions may have different objective function values.
#SPJ12
Answer:
Cost per equivalent unit = 4.015 per unit
Explanation:
Under the weighted average method of valuation, to account for completed units, it is assumed that the entire degree of work required is done in the period under consideration. So there is no separation of the completed units into opening inventory and fully worked.
Cost per equivalent unit = cost / total equivalent units
To determine the conversion cost per equivalent unit, we follow the steps below
Step 1
Determine the total equivalent units
Items units Equivalent units
Completed units 144,000 144,000× 100% 144,000
Closing inventory 31,500 31,500 × 60% = 18900
Total equivalent unit 162,900
Step 2
Calculate cost per equivalent unit
Cost per equivalent unit = Total conversion cost/Total equivalent units
= (602,150+ 51,850)/162,900 units
= 4.015 per units