Answer:
The purpose was to regulate European colonization and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism period. Coincidentally this period of time was also a time when Germany was just suddenly emerging as an Imperial power. The conference was organized by the first Chancellor of Germany, Otto Von Bismarck.
Explanation:
what is it?
Answer:
Suffrage, political franchise, or simply franchise is the right to vote in public, political elections (although the term is sometimes used for any right to vote). ... The combination of active and passive suffrage is sometimes called full suffrage.
Answer: b. Suffrage
Explanation:
In the declaration of independence the introduction already asserts the right of the people to be independent politically and to choose its separation from another people. No mention of a monarch or ruler is made. That is already an indirect statement on popular sovereignty. Then the preamble very explicitly states that the power of the government is derived from the “consent of the governed”, i.e. the people. Finally, the conclusion states that the Founding Fathers have made these decisions under the Authority not of a ruler but of “the good People of these Colonies”.
This is way more implicit with the Articles of Confederation. Since the Union had already been established the need for explicit and reiterated mentions of the people as holding the authority of the country was not as evident. Expressions such as “general interests “, “free inhabitants” and the “authority to us given” (by the people) are the ways this principle is mentioned.
The debate over counting the slave population in the United States resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation. This arrangement caused an imbalance of power in favor of the slave-holding states and led to controversy around congressional reapportionment. This situation changed following the abolition of slavery, when formerly enslaved individuals were fully counted towards their state's populations.
The issue of counting the slave population arose during the birth of the United States. It was centered around the question of whether or not to count enslaved individuals as part of a state's total population for both representation and taxation purposes.
This debate resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise in the 1787 Constitution, agreeing to count enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation. This was a controversial compromise because it effectively gave additional political power to the slave-holding states.
As part of this compromise, Three-Fifths of the enslaved population would be counted when determining a state's population for taxation and representation. The north and south continued to disagree on whether the 'extra' population of enslaved people should be counted, resulting in an imbalance of power in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. Despite the abolition of slavery, the effects of this arrangement persisted into the 1920s, creating controversy around the process of congressional reapportionment.
Last but not least, it's important to highlight the change in the political landscape following the abolition of slavery. Once slavery was abolished, the states that once benefited from the three-fifths counting rule now faced a challenging situation. These states had population increases with the formerly enslaved individuals being counted fully towards their respective states' total population.
#SPJ12
Answer:The Ganges River is extremely important to the people of India as most of the people living on its banks use it for daily needs such as bathing and fishing. It is also significant to Hindus as they consider it their most sacred river.