A tape-recorded interview from 1987 with a sport historian about ancient Greek Olympic Games in the 5th century B.C. is a primary source of historical evidence. So, the correct choice is option C.
A primary source of historical evidence is a tape-recorded interview conducted in 1987 with a famous sport historian about the ancient Greek Olympic Games in the 5th century B.C. Primary sources are original materials or eyewitness accounts created at the time of the event or shortly after. In this case, the interview with a sport historian provides firsthand knowledge and expert insights about the ancient Greek Olympic Games.
It offers direct information from a credible source with expertise in the subject matter, making it a valuable primary source for historians and researchers studying ancient Olympic history. The other options involve secondary sources, interpretations, or creations based on historical events, rather than direct, firsthand accounts or records from the time of the events. Therefore, option C is the suitable choice.
For more questions on Historical Evidence
#SPJ3
Answer:...
Explanation:
A smoking is still legal.
B smoking becomes illegal.
C Congress considers the vote before any laws are passed.
D Representatives may or may not vote to make smoking illegal.
In a direct democracy, if the people vote to make smoking illegal, Congress considers the vote before any laws are passed. Hence, option C is correct.
Direct democracy is the kind of democracy where people choose and give votes to policies and rules instead of choosing the political leader or the politician.
Direct democracy is different from the electrol democracy in which a political leader is chosen to make rules and regulation.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more details about Direct democracy, click here:
#SPJ2
The Middle colonies most likely had the most wildlife
The Middle Colonies were very blessed and this allowed them to develop a strong economy. Economic activities that took place there included:
Wildlife such as bears and beavers, enjoy living in forests and woods and so we can infer that due to the presence of large forests in the Middle colonies, there were most likely quite a lot of wildlife.
This is corroborated by the fact that hunting was another major economic activity in the Middle colonies therefore we can conclude that the Middle colonies most likely had the most wildlife.
Find out more at brainly.com/question/24659161.
Answer:
probably southren colonies
Explanation:
they had the most land that wasnt being farmed or citified
China
Japan
Mexico
The Know Nothing were Most concerned with denying immigrants from Mexico any opportunities. Thus, Mexico is the correct answer.
It demanded immigration limits, the ban on foreign-born people voting or holding public office in the US, and a 21-year residence requirement for citizenship as a national political movement. The Know-Nothing party had seen spectacular development by 1852.
They said that the country's company owners needed to hire real Americans, therefore they also intended to prevent these people from finding employment in the private sector. The vast majority of Know-Nothings were from the working and middle classes.
These folks were concerned that immigrants arriving in the country would compete for employment. The Know-Nothing movement sought to defend and protect historic American values while also combating foreign influences.
Learn more about Know-Nothing Party, here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
ireland
Explanation:
the know nothings were a nativist group that did not like immigrants coming into america. they were against immigrants from ireland and i think they were even anti-catholic, and the irish are predominantly catholic
Answer:
b i think correct me if im wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
THe correct answer is B pls i need brainliest to get me to my next level
Explanation:
Answer:
It means that the old times weren't as good as the phrase 'the good old times' made it seem.
explanation:
What Andrew Carnegie meant by this is that although we may use the phrase
“The ‘good old times’, those times were not really good times. This is because things were not clearly as good as it is today compared to those times. Going back to those times or old conditions would be disastrous as the good old times were not quite as civilized as we have it today.
From the speech from which he said these words, he said neither master nor servant were as well situated as they are today. This means that life wasn't very easy or comfortable in the old times compared to today.