Answer:
The river offered people a way to defend their city.
Explanation:
Water was pumped out of the Thames to put out fires started by the bombs and volunteers patrolled the river to ensure that the German ships didn’t enter the Port of London. Supplies and troops often traveled up and down the Thames when bombings obstructed the roads.
Hope this is helpful
There are several factors that hampers effective communication and some of them are:
This is defined as the ability to convey information to another efficiently and effectively.
Not being satisfied with one's job: When one has lost interest in his job, there is a possibility of non-effective communication.
Inability to listen to others: One cannot engage with another in communication if they are not listening to them.
Lack of transparency and trust:Lack of trust sure breeds ineffective communication.
Communication style: The style and approach of communication may differ from person to person and creates an ineffective communication.
Cultural differences: When there is a cultural and language barrier, there is ineffective communication.
Read more about communication here:
Ineffectivecommunication leads to conflict, which happens when either one of theindividuals have misunderstanding or are reaching over the same goal. (1) not talking things out, (2) not listeningto the side of the other, (3) close-minded, (4) not explaining well, (5) not facingyour responsibilities whether good or bad.
Answer: Adding sound effects or saying something with emphasis.
Explanation: That would make the listener be more invested in the story.
Answer:
be, am, is, are, was, were, being, been
Explanation:
The verb be is irregular. It has eight different forms: be, am, is, are, was, were, being, been. The present simple and past simple tenses make more changes than those of other verbs.
Death of a pig is similar to the essays Total eclipse and the Ketchup Conundrum in the sense that all of these include in them some kind of food in them, taste in them.
Explanation:
The Death of a pig talks about a person who wants to save some one whom he really cares about in the story from dying and saving from a disease which is life threatening. Thus it is a tragic story and a sad story.
In this story, the man thought that since the disease was contagious and since it could pass on from one person to the other person or to any living being, he would also soon become like the pig.
All three essays use rich descriptions but vary in tone. White's essay 'Death of a Pig' has a personal, emotional tone, while Dillard's 'Total Eclipse' takes a more existential approach and Gladwell's 'The Ketchup Conundrum' uses research and analysis. The narrative style of 'Death of a Pig' is more introspective compared to the other two.
In comparing the style of 'Death of a Pig' by E.B. White with Annie Dillard's 'Total Eclipse' and Malcolm Gladwell's 'The Ketchup Conundrum', there are notable similarities and differences. All three essays use rich descriptions to illustrate their ideas and enliven their settings. However, White's essay shows a more personal and emotional tone, reflecting on the pig's death on his farm, while Dillard and Gladwell have a more objective and detached perspective in their essays.
'Death of a Pig' and 'Total Eclipse' share a strong use of imagery and symbolism. Yet, while White dwells more on emotions and morbid reality, Dillard's essay tends to dwell on the existential and naturalistic, using the eclipse as an analog for the temporary and fleeting nature of human existence.
'Death of a Pig''s style differs from 'The Ketchup Conundrum' in its narrative style. Gladwell tends to draw on research and use an analysis-focused approach, probing into the history and intricacies of ketchup as a socio-economic product, while White's essay has a more introspective, narrative style, focusing more on personal experience and reflection.
#SPJ6
Answer:
This is an excerpt from Henry David Thoreau’s seminal essay “Civil Disobedience.
He is of the opinion that casting your vote is not the end of the democratic process. He is advocating civil disobedience and a participatory democracy.
Furthermore, although your vote might be overwhelmed by the majority, you still have a moral obligation to ensure a better leadership. It must exceed just the ballot
The sentence provides an abstract view of voting, portraying it as a game of chance with moral considerations where the result depends on the majority, and not necessarily aligning with one's personal vote.
This sentence seems to be offering a commentary on the nature of voting as a process. The author appears to be suggesting that all voting inherently has an aspect of chance to it, akin to playing a game like checkers or backgammon. They bring up a moral element, implying that voting involves making decisions about what is right and wrong. However, they also note that 'the character of the voters is not staked', suggesting that the individual's personal integrity or morality isn't under threat when one votes. The author accepts the majority's decision, even if it contradicts their own vote, and doesn't feel obligated to make the 'right' choice win.
#SPJ3