Answer:They include juvenile delinquency, poverty, examination malpractice, drug abuse, kidnapping, cultism, among others.
B)Some states don’t collect income tax
C)Some states don’t collect sales tax.
D)Taxes at the local, state and federal level are all equal
Taxes at the local, state and federal level are all equal
Further Explanation:
the USA has a separate federal, state and local government with taxes that are imposed at each level. Taxes are levied on property, sales, income, estates, gifts. In 2010 the taxes collected by all the level of government accounts 24.8% of the GDP. Taxes are heavy on the labour income than on capital income. Divergent taxes and subsidies are a form of indirect taxation. Taxes are imposed on the net income of the person. The federal margins or tax rates vary from 10% to 37% of the taxable income. Payroll taxes are imposed by both federal and state government. Property tax are imposed by the local government. Sales tax are imposed by most of the states. US imposes tariffs on imported goods. Estates and gift taxes are applied by federal and some of the state government. Income tax imposed at the federal and state level. A federal wealth tax is required by the US Constitution to distribute it to the states according to the population. The taxpayers fall into seven categories depending on the taxable income-10%, 12%, 20%, 24%, 32%, 35% to 37%. The tax system of the USA is progressive as income rises tax rises.
Learn More:
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Taxes in U.S.A.
Subject: Social Science
Keywords:
Levied, property, sales, income, diverging taxes, indirect taxation, progressive.
First, I would say that government has no moral basis (or authority) unless it has been granted them by its citizens. There are various mechanisms to do this — to temporarily transfer collective moral agency to elected representatives and civic institutions, for example — that are grounded in an ongoing collective agreement, and allow adjustment, accountability and malleability over time. It is in these cases that we can say that the moral will of the populace is being expressed by its government, and thereby providing its “moral basis.”
Second, as a fine example, I would encourage examining John Rawls’ “original position” argument as one morally framed approach to governance (i.e. one that promotes fairness, justice and equality according to the most generous definitions of those terms as broadly accepted values). His thought experiment is very simple, very clear, and very “reasonable.” And within his arguments, the moral authority of representatives operating behind Rawls’ veil of ignorancebecomes self-evident.
Third, I would say that the morality of government must therefore reflect the moral maturity of its populace. This is perhaps the most challenging aspect of the equation, because once the two (collective will vs. civic institutions) starts getting out-of-synch, the the moral agreements that justify government break down. Such an unfortunate state of disequilibrium is pretty much where we are today in the U.S., where some 30% of the electorate has regressed to a level of moral immaturity that is aggressively corroding more advanced civic institutions.
hope this helps thanks