Answer:
The Land Lottery System of Land Allocation replaced the Headright System.
Explanation:
The headright system of land allocation was a process of land allocation that was prevalent in Georgia, Virginia, and other states in the United States of America in the 1600s. The system entailed the grant of 50 acres of land to settlers in the States where the system was applicable. The grant served as an incentive to encourage immigrants/settlers into the regions. It was used as a means of increasing the population in the region as well as increasing the labor force in these regions. However, in 1800s, the land lottery system replaced the headright sytem of land allocation. The land lottery system of land allocation was a method of land allocation that entail the casting of lots. Under this system, qualified citizens registered for the lottery, and the winner in the raffles draw is entitled to the allotment of lands that was formerly occupied by the creek Indians. This system of land allocation held sway in Georgia between 1805 to 1833.
B. Parties work to detect and eliminate bias and propaganda in the mass media
C. Parties educate the electorate about campaign issues
D. Parties monitor the actions of officeholders
E. Parties recruit and nominate candidates
B. labor activists
C. the wealthy
D. philosophers
The correct answer is: "the wealthy"
Socialism is based on the ideas of Karl Marx. Marx claimed for a social revolt, in which the majority of people in society, that he denominated the proletariats (factory workers, farmers, etc), should rise against the bourgeousie, the social class that was constituted by the minority of rich people, who owned the means of production and therefore where the employers that exploited the proletariats. Under this social system, those who were already rich would continue increasing their fortunes at the expense of the working class, that suffered awful working and living conditions.
The rich classes in society, constituted by the members of the bourgeoisie, were the ones who feared socialism as it meant a threat to the status quo and hence to their privileged position in society .
Answer:
the wealthy is the correct answer
Explanation:
Answer:
Judges in federal appellate courts determine whether lower court made an error in a case.
Explanation:
The appeals courts deliver an instance of understanding which allows respondents to contest for a reasonable analysis of the judgment. It is a democratic process of ensuring the comprehensive benefit of defense considering the tribunal which can analyze the preceding condemnation. This overrides the situation of any errors or unfairness of the authorities.
Judges in federal appellate courts determine whether:
the law has been applied correctly in the trial court
legal procedures were followed properly in the trial court
the defendant's constitutional rights were violated during the trial or investigation
Appellate courts, also known as courts of appeals, are part of the federal judicial system that is responsible for hearing appeals and reviewing cases from the lower courts.
Their job is not to re-try cases or hear new evidence, but rather to determine if legal errors that might have affected the outcome occurred in the lower court's proceedings. They provide a check on the power of the trial courts by overseeing their decisions and helping ensure consistency in the application of the law.
Learn more about appellate courts at
#SPJ6