Answer:
B. is the anwser.
Explanation:
Read it does it make sense with out context?
Answer:
PRECEDENT
Explanation:
Justice Black uses a form of legal reasoning known as precedent. This process involves citing previous legal decisions to support a particular argument or decision in a case. Specifically, Justice Black uses Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. as a precedent to argue against the majority decision in Tinker v. Des Moines.
When Justice Black refers to Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. in the dissenting opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, he is utilizing a form of legal reasoning known as precedent. A precedent is an existing legal decision that courts turn to when making rulings on similar issues or cases. When a judge uses precedent, they are looking at past rulings to guide them in their decision-making process for the case they are currently working on.
Using precedent, or citing a previous judgment, gives a foundation to the legal argument being made. Precedent is particularly impactful in a legal dissenting opinion because it gives credibility to the argument and draws attention to past interpretations of the law that support the viewpoint being put forth.
For instance, in Tinker v. Des Moines case, Justice Black used Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. to argue that the court's allowance for symbolic speech in the form of wearing black armbands in school did, indeed, constitute a 'real' disruption of school activities – contrary to the majority opinion. He thus believed that the ruling was in violation of the precedent set by Giboney.
#SPJ5
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Dad thought we should have hamburgers for the cookout, Mom wanted chicken.
B.
Dad thought we should have hamburgers for the cookout; Mom wanted chicken.
C.
Dad thought we should have hamburgers for the cookout; but Mom wanted chicken.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
i got it right
Answer:
d
Explanation: