Answer:
The answer is $41.2
Explanation:
This will be solved by Dividend Discount Model which is one of the ways of valuing the price of shareholders' equity.
Here, the future value of dividend payment are discounted using the cost of equity.
Ke = D1/Po + g
Where Ke is the cost of equity
D1 is future dividend payment.
Po is the current share price or stock price
g is the growth rate.
To find the current price of stock price, we need to re write the equation;
Po = D1 ÷ (Ke - g)
D1 = Do x 1.03
= $2 x 1.03
=2.06
Ke = 8% or 0.08
g = 3% or 0.03
So we have;
2.06 ÷ (0.08 -0.03)
$2.06 ÷ 0.05
$41.2
Answer:
(i) and (iv)
Explanation:
The appreciable cost is the cost in which the assets can be depreciation over the useful life
And, the appreciable cost is come after deducting the salvage value from the acquisition cost
The formula to compute the depreciation expense using the straight-line method is shown below:
= (Original cost - salvage value) ÷ (useful life)
So it can be calculated after considering the first and four options
Answer:
a. will reduce profits by $40,000
Explanation:
A: TR - TC = 650 * 2,100 - [$300,000 + (650 * 1,700)]1,365,000 - 1,405,000 = $ - 40,000
Therefore, this campaign will reduce profits by $40,000
The advertising campaign would reduce profits by $40,000. This is calculated by subtracting the campaign cost and additional costs per bed day from the total revenue generated from bed days.
The subject of this question is the financial impact of a proposed advertising campaign on a system's profits. To determine the effect on profits, we need to calculate the difference between the anticipated additional revenue and the anticipated increased costs, and then subtract the cost of the advertising campaign.
In this scenario, the total additional revenue from 650 bed days, at $2,100 each, would be $2,100 x 650 = $1,365,000. The total additional costs from these bed days would be $1,700 x 650 = $1,105,000. Subtracting costs from revenue, we have $1,365,000 - $1,105,000 = $260,000. Finally, we subtract the cost of the campaign, $260,000 - $300,000 = -$40,000. So, the advertising campaign would reduce profits by $40,000. Therefore, the correct choice is (a).
#SPJ3
Answer:
correct option is d.$7,511.61 unfavorable
Explanation:
given data
standard material cost = $1.97 per yard
Actual material cost = $2.05 per yard
Standard yards = 4.67 per unit
Actual yards = 5.08 per unit
Units of production = 9300
solution
we get here Direct material quantity variance that is express as
Direct material quantity variance = (Standard quantity - actual quantity) × Standard rate .....................1
put here value and we will get
Direct material quantity variance = (9300 × 4.67 - 9300 × 5.08) × 1.97
Direct material quantity variance = −7511.61
so correct option is d.$7,511.61 unfavorable
Answer:
$600 unfavorable
Explanation:
The budgeted cost of producing 14,000 units at $5.50 per unit and with fixed costs of $19,400 is:
The variance is given by subtracting the budgeted cost by the actual cost ($97,000):
Since the variance is negative, the variance is unfavorable
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The new packaging did not improve the product itself.
According to the VRIO framework, in order for the packaging to be a valuable resource it has to enable the company to exploit opportunities or defend against threats, it also needs to help organizations to increase the perceived customer value by increasing differentiation or/and decreasing the cost of the product. If the resources do not meet this condition, it can lead to competitive disadvantage.