There are different reasons for development. The answers to the questions are below;
Industrial technology is simply known as the use of engineering and manufacturing technology to increase production. This makes it faster, simpler, and more efficient.
Learn more about growth from
I relatively think so.
True democracy is one in which everyone has the same opportunities to be defined as the representative of the people. In this context, the draw seems to be the most effective way to maintain the level playing field, since it discards any kind of economic and ideological influence. Not at all, Montesquieu (1746) and other thinkers suggest that the method of choosing lottery rulers would represent the true nature of democracy.
The logic behind the draw process comes directly from the idea that power corrupts, which makes sense when analyzing the current political landscape of various countries. However, the applicability of a lottery system should be widely discussed, but it does not seem reasonable for the present, but that makes sense, it does.
Patrick Henry believed they were illegal because there was no justification for taxing them. It was unreasonable and illogical.
The Second Virginia Convention (1775) was addressed by American lawyer, planter, politician, and orator Patrick Henry, who famously said: "Give me liberty, or give me death!" He was a founding father who presided over Virginia's first and sixth post-colonial governorships, respectively, between 1776 and 1779 and 1784 and 1786.
As a representative to the First Continental Congress in 1774, Henry signed the Continental Association and the Petition to the King, both of which he had a hand in drafting. His speech at the convention and the march of troops toward Williamsburg after the Gunpowder Event helped him garner even more support from the people of Virginia.
Learn more about Patrick Henry, from:
#SPJ2
Based on your answer, imagine one argument the Brown court might have made for or against Plessy.
It's best to choose option (B). The Brown Court would not have permitted racial segregation on trains.
Argument- The Brown court might contend, in Plessy's case, that regardless of race, everyone has the right to be in the same building or general vicinity as a white person.
This is a valid point to make given the Brown decision's explanation of why a person of color should be allowed to be in the same space as a white person.
In the famous Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the "separate but equal" principle, which holds that racial segregation laws are constitutional as long as they provide equal access to facilities for all races.
The ruling validated numerous state statutes that had been implemented in the American South following the end of the Reconstruction era that had reinstituted racial segregation (1865–1877).
Plessy is largely recognized as one of the worst rulings in the history of the US Supreme Court.
Hence, Option (B) is the correct choice.
Learn more about Plessy's case, from:
#SPJ2
Answer:
No
Explanation:
One argument that the Brown court could make for Plessy's case is that everyone has the right to be in the same facility or general area as a white person, regardless of their race. This would be an argument that could be made because the Brown court won, explaining that a person of color should be able to be in the same place as a white person.