Answer: Should Andrew Jackson be remembered as a hero or a villain?
Andrew Jackson was considered a villain mostly because of what he did to the American Indians. He was the one who had signed the Controversial Indian Removal Act in 1830 in which started the Trail of Tears. He was also a antagonist towards his politicians.
Military Conflict: Battle of New Orleans
Country of nationality: United States
Explanation: If you can pls give me brainlyest. thx
Jackson is seen as a hero due to his role in the rise of the Democratic Party and his stand against the Second Bank of the United States. However, he is also seen as a villain due to his policy towards Native Americans, particularly the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
Whether Andrew Jackson was a villain or a hero depends largely on one's perspective. On one hand, Jackson was a charismatic leader who used his understanding of the views of the majority to emerge as a significant figure in American politics. He played a key role in the rise of the Democratic Party and successfully navigated through the Nullification Crisis. His supporters viewed his war against the Second Bank of the United States as a righteous fight against entrenched insider interests of money and power. On the other hand, Jackson's presidency was marred by controversy over his treatment of Native Americans, with his firm commitment to remove native residents from states in the South culminating in the notorious Indian Removal Act of 1830. Thus, some might see him as a hero of democracy and expansion, while others might see him as a villain because of his policy towards Native Americans.
#SPJ2
Answer:
I think its C.
Explanation:
hope this helps! :)
Answer:
I believe it's D
Explanation:
Hope I helped! I'm really sorry if I got the answer wrong <3
Answer: pAragraph
Explanation:
Ivan the Terrible, or Ivan IV, the First Tsar of All Russia, had a complicated personality. Ivan 's tragic past, intelligent and prone to bursts of uncontrollable anger, led to his notorious conduct. Not much detail is known about his early life, and his successes as a leader are discussed by historians. It is widely accepted, however, that for centuries to come, his reign formed the present Russian territory and centralised government.
Ivan IV went into a deep depression following the death of his first wife in 1560, and his behaviour became more erratic. His assumption that the Boyars had killed her just deepened his anxiety. He suddenly left Moscow and threatened to abdicate the throne. Ivan the Great's grandson, Ivan the Terrible, was born Ivan Chetvyorty Vasilyevich to members of the Rurik dynasty on August 25, 1530, in the Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Russia. When he was 3 years old , his father, Basil III, died.
Ivan the Awful became obsessed with death in 1584, with his health failing, calling upon witches and soothsayers to sustain him, but to no avail. On March 18, 1584, when Ivan died from an apparent stroke, the end came. His unfit son, Feodor, whose rule spiralled Russia into the disastrous Time of Troubles, leading to the formation of the Romanov Dynasty, had desired the kingdom.
This is all from different websites. This is also written in my own words, so don’t worry about copy and paste. You may have to make the paragraph smaller. If you need help let me know. Good luck!