Answer:
Total ending inventory $ 2,162.5 LIFO perpetual method
Explanation:
At the time of each sale we determinate the last untis available for sale:
Beginning 175
Purchase 200
Slaes of 300
We use the entire 200 units purchase and 100 of the beginning inventory leaving
Beginning inventory of 75
Now, we continue:
Beginning inventory 75
5/15 purchase 200
Sales of 250 units
we use the entire 200 untis form the purchase and 50 units from beginning inventory
leaving
Beginning inventory 25 at 11.50 = 287.5
5/25 purcahse 150 units at 12.50 = 1875
Total ending inventory 2,162.5
Answer:
Fees Income 112,400 debit
Income Summary 112,400 credit
Income Summary 31,720 debit
Advertising Expense 3,800 credit
Depreciation Expense—Equip 800 credit
Rent Expense 2,600 credit
Salaries Expense 18,800 credit
Utilities Expense 5,720 credit
income summary 80,680 debit
Emilio Gonzalez, Drawing 6,200 credit
Emilio Gonzalez, Capital 74,480 credit
Explanation:
We close the temporary account which are, reveneus and expenses against income summary then we close this account balance against Emilio Capital Account along with Emilio's drawings.
(B) lower than it was in short-run equilibrium but higher than it was originally (before aggregate demand increased).
(C) lower than it was originally (before aggregate demand increased).
(D) equal to what it was originally (before aggregate demand increased).
Answer:
The answer is (A) higher than it was in short-run equilibrium.
Explanation:
Answer:
Objective Theory
Explanation:
The Objective theory states that the intent to form a contract will be judged by outward objective facts such as the words and actions of the party instead of the secret, subjective intentions. This theory replaced the Subjective theory in the late nineteenth century. The former theory was of the opinion that the meeting of minds, which translates to the unexpressed intentions of the party would form a basis for interpreting the intent to form a contract.
The objective theory is important as it advocates freedom to a fair hearing, freedom of contract, and personal independence or sovereignty.
b. a decrease in government expenditures, or a decrease in taxes,
c. or both. an increase in government expenditures, or a decrease in taxes, or both.
d. a decrease in government expenditures, or an increase in taxes, or both.
e. increasing government expenditures while holding taxes constant.
An example of contractionary fiscal policy is: d. a decrease in government expenditures, or an increase in taxes, or both.
Contractionary fiscal policy aims to reduce aggregate demand in an economy, which is to typically to combat inflation or cool down an overheating economy. It can be achieved through various means, including reducing government expenditures and increasing taxes.
Both actions decrease the overall amount of money circulating in the economy, which can lead to reduced consumer spending and business investment, helping to bring down inflationary pressures. Thus, generally combining a decrease in government expenditures with an increase in taxes can be an even more potent form of contractionary fiscal policy, as it addresses both the particular sides of the fiscal equation.
#SPJ6
Answer:
= $120,500.00
Explanation:
Flexible budget is that which is that which recognizes the cost behavior and is used for control purpose. It is prepared based on the actual level of activity achieved.
Kindly note that the $59,000 depreciation is a fixed cost which do not vary with the hours of production.
The flexible budget for the department will be
Direct Labour budget = ( 51000/3400) × 4,100
= $61,500.00
Equipment depreciation= $59,000
Total flexible budget = $61,500.00 + $59,000
= $120,500.00
Answer:
On January 1st, the $3,000 could buy 10,000 Swiss francs (3,000/0.3).
On June 1st, the $3,000 would buy 7,500 Swiss francs (3,000/0.4).
Explanation:
On January 1st, each Swiss francs could only purchase $0.30 while on June 1st, each Swiss francs could purchase $0.40.
These show that the Swiss francs had appreciated in value relative to the US Dollars with a positive change of 33%. Therefore, the dollar had weakened against the Swiss francs by the same rate.
Answer:
7500 Swiss francs
Explanation:
Working
January 1, Swiss francs = $0.3
$3000 will by 3000/0.3 = 10,000 Swiss francs.
June 1 , Swiss Francs = $ 0.4
$3000 will buy 7500 Swiss francs.
This also mean that in January 3.33 Swiss francs will buy 1 $
In June 1 , 2.5 Swiss francs will buy one dollar.
This shows that Swiss francs has appreciated in value against dollar over the months