Answer: Agree with her friends, informational social influence
Explanation:
Jassie believes that the her friends are right due to social influence they have on her. Due to informational social influence, Jessie will agree to anything her friends says. This type of influence is also called social proof. A person exhibit it when they are amidst crisis or situation beyond their control, or when the situation is big and difficult to explain. It is mainly expressed when someone does not believe in herself especially in his capabilities, they tend to look at others.
Question Options;
a) disagree; informational social influence
b) disagree; normative social influence
c) agree; informational social influence
d) agree; normative social influence
Answer: Jessie, who is not absolutely sure of the race of the suspect is likely to AGREE with Paul and Adam because of the effect of INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE.
Explanation: Informational social influence refers to an act whereby an individual or people copy the actions of people because they believe someone else is right. It is also known as Social Proof and it was coined by Robert Cialdini in his 1984 book, Influence. It is a change in opinion or behavior when we believe others have the right or accurate information.
Jessie was not absolutely sure but because of the opinion of "others", Paul and Adam, she is likely to agree due to the phenomenon of INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE.
Answer:
through law
Explanation:
In order to solve a conflict between two groups, something need to be used as the 'mediator' between the two. This mediator needs to be impartial and had a set of pre-determined rules that can be used as a standard of 'right' or 'wrong'.
Almost every society that exist in the world right now established a judicial system in order to act as this mediator.
Both parties that are involved in a conflict are allowed to present their case to the judge. After hearing each of the presentation, the judge will checked how each of their position stand according to the law and determine who are in the 'right' and who are in the 'wrong'/
According to the text "Evaluating a Case Study: Developing a Practical Ethical Viewpoint," Ms. Smith, Mrs. Taylor and Mr. Jones cannot agree on who deserves to win a prize for outstanding moral behaviour. The candidates are Mr. Big and Mrs. Little. The main ethical concerns are: whether one big, good act counts more than many small good acts; whether benefitting one person greatly is better than benefitting many in small ways; and whether a good act that does not benefit the actor is better than an act that does benefit him.
The approach that I would use is utilitarianism. According to this approach, the "most" moral act is the one that contributes to the greater happiness of a greater number of people. According to this idea, Mr. Big would win the award. This is because Mr. Big saved a man from drowning. However, this man was an important businessman, which means that Mr. Big also saved all of the man's employees from having to face unemployment. He benefitted the largest number of people.
Trade is impossible because they are so far from each other.
Trade is easy because of the direct line between their major ports.
Trade is easy because of their long, shared border.
Trade is limited because of physical barriers on land and water.
Geography does have an impact on the bilateral trade between China and India. China is India's largest trading partner. Trade is easy because they share some borderline and they are very close to each other. Although their major ports are not so close to each other, they manage to succeed in their trading business.
Answer:
Over time, individual colonies and states steadily began expanding the right to vote to all white men, not just property owners. hope this help :D
do they affect trade?
Answer:
Most rainforests are found in the Congo river basin on the Atlantic Ocean side. They affect trade because the rainforest trees are being cutted down for wood and animals are being poached.
Explanation:
Answer:
They were different in violent sand none violent.
Explanation:
The Roman republic used a method that didint evolve in violence but the empire used valence all the time to punish someone if something bad happened they would always start wars