(b)collaborate with other countries to reach goals for reducing environmental emissions
(c)stop international agreements on environmental policy found to create more harm
(d) abide by international agreements to increase the use of nonrenewable resources
Answer:
Just took a quiz with this question, and I got it right, it's B-collaborate with other countries to reach goals for reducing environmental emissions
Explanation:
Since the graph is showing countries that ratified the Kyoto protocol, and what countries are undecided, did not ratify and withdrew ratification.
B. The Kings family members
C. Local tribal chiefs
D. Elected politicians
Answer:
the kings family members
Explanation:
Answer:
b kings family
Explanation:
the king rules over so his family is royalty and will have high authority in the government
b. The government successfully halted the importation of illegal alcohol .
c. Alcohol consumption decreased but did not entirely stop.
d. Veterans of World War I made sure the 18th Amendment was defeated.
The National Prohibition of Alcohol in America (1920-1933) was undertaken to reduce crime, corruption, solve social problems, and improve health and hygiene. This prohibition sanctioned the production, transport, and sale of alcohol. However, during this ban, many controversies were recorded, such as the illegal distribution of alcohol, which became one of the main sales and profit streams by the gangsters of that time. Also, alcohol was widely prescribed by the doctors for medical purposes, so doctors in the period from 1921 to 1930 earned about forty million dollars for whiskey recipes. However, according to official data, the use of alcohol decreased during the prohibition, the mortality rate caused by liver cirrhosis decreased from 29.5 to 10.7.
The answer is: c.
Answer:
a dispute between individuals or organizations.
Explanation:
Civil law involves disputes between people or organizations. In a civil law case, one person, the plaintiff, accuses another person, the defendant. Examples of civil law disputes would involve destruction of property or the victim of a car accident. If the judge agrees with the plaintiff, the defendant must pay some sort of compensation. This is in contrast to criminal law, which involves a person committing some sort of crime. In a criminal law case, the plaintiff is the government, and the person accused of the crime is the defendant. Someone guilty in a criminal law case could face fines or be sent to prison.