How does the U.S. Constitution protect the unalienable right to liberty? A. by including the principle of habeas corpus B. by establishing legislative superiority C. by establishing checks and balances D. by including the "necessary and proper" clause

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: The U.S. Constitution protects the unalienable right to liberty by including the principle of habeas corpus. Including the principle of habeas corpus protects an individual from unlawful detention and grants individual specific rights to legal counsel and certain judiciary procedures to protect an individuals liberty.

Answer 2

Answer:

Answer:by including the principle of habeas corpus

Explanation:

Related Questions

What colledgedid alexander hamilton go to?
Room invasions are a significant security issue for hotels located in conus
Which constitutional action starts the process by which a president is removed from office?proportional representationfirst-past-the-post electionapportionmentimpeachmentannexation
What was the lesson learned by the people who organized Mexicanfarmworkers?
How did immigration through Ellis Island differ from immigration through Angel Island?Angel Island had greater capacity and was more efficient, so immigrants moved more quickly. Europeans came through Angel Island and were treated poorly because of bias toward them. Europeans came through Ellis Island, received physicals, were interviewed, and were processed efficiently. Both Ellis Island and Angel Island processed immigrants quickly and efficiently into the United States.

Credit claiming allows presidents to take the credit for positive events or actions they directly had influenced throughout their previous term?

Answers

True

Credit claiming is one of the most effective strategies especially in reelection campaigns as it allows presidents to use their performance records to win the hearts of the electorate. It is also important as it ensures that presidents work for the people in order to win reelections

In his summary of the majority opinion, what does Fortas say the district court did?A. That the students' actions did not infringe on the rights of others
B. That it found the peaceful protest of the students to be reasonable
C. That it upheld the constitutionality of the schools' decision to suspend the students
D. That it agreed with the complaint submitted by the students' parents

Answers

The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "C. That it upheld the constitutionality of the schools' decision to suspend the students." In his summary of the majority opinion, Fortas say that the district court did is that it upheld the constitutionality of the schools' decision to suspend the students

If the Constitution were up for ratification today, who do you think would win more support – the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists? Why?

Answers

federalist because that way they could do what ever they wanted with the government because there is no way that they would be opposed by the constitution.

Final answer:

The question whether Federalists or Anti-Federalists would gain more support if the Constitution were up for ratification today is theoretical, and would depend on current judgments concerning power balance, individual rights, state sovereignty, and central government effectiveness. Historically, the Constitution was ratified with the promise of a Bill of Rights, satisfying both Federalist and Anti-Federalist concerns. Modern understandings of these ideologies and the Constitution are complex, as it represents a blend of both philosophies and changes according to societal needs.

Explanation:

If the Constitution was up for ratification today, deciding whether the Federalists or Anti-Federalists would win more support is purely speculative and would depend on the priorities of the present-day populous. Federalists historically sought a strong central government for national defense and economic growth, seeing it as beneficial to society, whereas Anti-Federalists feared the concentration of power in the hands of a few, arguing for protection of individual rights and state sovereignty.

Respecting the historical context, Federalists won ratification by promising the inclusion of a bill of rights which protected individual rights - an Anti-Federalist concern. In the present day, favorability towards Federalist or Anti-Federalist views could therefore largely depend on current perceptions about the balance of power, individual rights, state sovereignty, and the effectiveness of the central government.

Nevertheless, it is crucial to remember that these political ideologies correspond to the late 18th-century context and translating them directly to today may overlook complexities of modern socio-political structures. Regardless of theoretical support, the Constitution today is arguably a blend of both Federalist and Anti-Federalist ideals and remains a living document, evolving according to the needs and values of the society.

Learn more about Federalists vs Anti-Federalists here:

brainly.com/question/29496480

#SPJ3

Through which war did franklin
d. roosevelt steer the nation?

Answers

Answer:

World War II

Explanation:

The American President Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office from 1933 until his death in 1945. During World War II (1939-1945), his administration supported Britain and France, while keeping its neutrality. But after the Pearl Habor Attack by the Japanese on December 7, 1941, the American President urged Congress to break American's isolationist policy, and the following day, the U.S. declared its entrance in WW II.

Franklin D. Roosevelt led the United States through World War II and the Great Depression.

To which principle of government is Montesquieu's statement MOST directly related?

Answers

First of all, Montesquieu is known for his statement that there should be a separation of powers within the government. He was known for his contributions for the aforementioned doctrine, however, we have to take note that he was not the one who was the author of it. He was referring to the separation of powers of the church and state, in this case, it applies in a democratic government - out of everything else.

Answer:

D) Separation of Powers

Explanation:

How did climate an the environment affect the practice of hunting and gathering and human culture during the Paleolithic period?

Answers

Back then, the source of food was heavily influenced by the climate and environment.

After a period of time, a group of hunters and gatherers will be forced to move an area because they have no source of food left

hope this helps

Hunter-gatherers depended on locally available resources for food and all the materials they needed to live. They built their lives around what was available and the conditions they faced.

Other Questions

"...Congress was hearing testimony concerning NAFTA. If this agreement is signed as it is currently drafted, the next thing you will hear will be a giant sucking sound as the remainder of our manufacturing jobs00what's left after the two million that went to Asia in the 1980s00get pulled across our southern border." 00 Ross Perot, Not For Sale At Any PriceAccording to Ross Perot, the "giant sucking sound" is the (5 points) increase in American jobs he predicted NAFTA would cause loss of jobs to Mexico that he predicted NAFTA would cause increase in U.S. jobs that would happen if they altered NAFTA loss of jobs to Mexico that would happen if they altered NAFTA

Why was the Continental Congress unable to provide the army with proper equipment?

Where did most immigrants settle when they entered the United States during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries?A. throughout the south B. in the midwest C. along the coastlines and borders D. in the mountains

What has been the key to political power in southeast asia and why?