Answer:
a. advocate redistributing income from David to Rita.
Explanation:
Since David is getting a lower utility from his last dollar obtained (6) than Rita (10), the benefit that David gains from this last dollar is less than what Rita would gain if she was the one receiving this dollar. Therefore, those who favor an equal distribution of income would advocate redistributing income from David to Rita, since total utility would increase with this redistribution.
a. Is this a fair deal for you? Justify your answer with an engineering economics analysis and discussion of the situation by calculating the Net Present Value (NPV) for the scenario.
b. Draw a Cash Flow Diagram for this situation.
Answer:
a. It is not a fair deal for me.
The question is how much is $1,000 today when received in 12 months' time from now. The present value of $1,000 at 5% effective interest rate is $952 ($1,000 * 0.952). The other repayment of $1,100 in 2 years' time from now is worth $997.70 today at the 5% effective interest rate. This implies that my friend is repaying me $1,949.70 in present value terms.
For friendship sake, I may lend her the money, but in economic analysis terms, the NPV value will yield a negative value of $50.30 ($2,000 - $1,949.70). My friend is not actually paying me back the amount I would lend to her. She is paying me less than I actually would lend to her.
b. Cash Flow Diagram:
Year 1 Year 2
F1 F2
$1,000 $1,100 (Inflows)
Fo⇵.................⇵.......................⇵...........................⇵n period
Year 0
$2,000 (outflows)
Explanation:
The cash flow diagram for this loan is the graphical representation of the timing of the cash flows with a clear marking of the repayments made by my best friend in two instalments and the $2,000 that I lent to her. This cash flow diagram presents the flow of cash as arrows on a timeline scaled to the magnitude of the cash flow, where outflows are down arrows and inflows are up arrows.
The Net present value (NPV) of this loan shows the difference between the present value of repayments by my best friend and the present value of $2,000 that I lent to her over a period of 2 years. To obtain this difference, the present values of cash inflows of $1,000 in a year's time and $1,100 in two years' time are determined using the discount factor table based on the given interest rate of 5%.
B. An increase in the supply of tennis racquets
C. An increase in the price of tennis racquets
D. None of the above would decrease the demand for tennis racquets
Answer:
C) An increase in the price of tennis racquets
Explanation:
If tennis racquets become more expensive, the demand for them will decline, and people will try to supply this need with substitutes, for example, lacrosse raquets. The reason for this is that the classical supply and demand model tells us that demand and price are inversely correlated: if the price goes up, demand goes down, and viceversa.
Answer: They would want to change the corporate charter to allow cumulative voting instead of noncumulative voting.
b. Overstate net income by $38,000.
c. Understate net income by $38,000.
d. Have no effect on net income.
Answer:
Net profit or net income is overstated by $38000 and option B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The adjusting entry to be made for accrued and unpaid wages would have been,
Wages expense 38000 Dr
Wages payable 38000 Cr
This entry would record an increase in expenses of $38000 and an increase in liabilities of $38000. As the entry is omitted, the expenses of $38000 are not recorded thus the expenses in income statement are understated. An understatement of expenses means an overstatement of profit by the same amount.
Thus, net profit or net income is overstated by $38000
Answer:
Explanation:
The comparison of psychological benefits to actual tangible costs depends on the individual in question. If the individual is constantly stressed to the point which the stress is affecting his/her health, work performance, mood, behavior around family, etc. then the tangible costs of going on vacation may be worth it. This is because a vacation would provide a moment of relaxation which would relieve all of that individual's stress and in doing so improve the individual's work performance, health, and overall quality of life. Therefore, the comparison between physical benefits to costs is always going to be a personal opinion.