(a) Count the number of ways to select a sample of 3 people to serve on a board of directors from a population of 6 people. answer: (b) If a simple random sampling procedure is to be employed, the chances that any particular sample will be the one selected are

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

a) 20

b) Equally likely, 0.05

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

Population size, n = 6

Sample size, r = 3

a) Ways to select a sample of 3 from a population of 6

= n^C_r\n=^6C_3\n\n=(6!)/(3!(6-3)!)\n\n=(6!)/(3!3!)\n\n=20

Thus, there are 20 ways in which a sample of 3 can be selected from a population of 6.

b) The chances that any particular sample will be the one selected are equally likely.

\text{Probability} = \displaystyle\frac{\text{Number of favourable outcomes}}{\text{Total number of outcomes}}

Probability of selecting one particular sample  =

\text{P(Sample)} = (1)/(20) = 0.05

Thus, 0.05 is the equally likely probability of selecting one sample.


Related Questions

Find the quotient of 2/5 and 4/5Give your answer as a fraction in its simplest form.
The economic entity assumption states that economic events A. of different entities can be combined if all the entities are corporations. B. must be reported to the IASB. C. of a sole proprietorship cannot be distinguished from the personal economic events of its owners. D. of every entity can be separately identified and accounted for.
3x-165=7x=105What is x?
HELP it’s not 20.40 which is what someone else answered lol
For which x is f(x)?=-3-7-445

Solve for the given variable: 4. 24 - 9x = -3x

5. 4(5x + 2) + 11 = 18x + 3

6. 3x - 8x = -27 – 13

Show Your Work

Answers

Answer:

4. x=4

5. x=-8

6. x=8

Step-by-step explanation:

It may take one extra step to get to the solution, but this method always works.

1. find the variable term that is smallest or most negative. Subtract all the terms on that side of the equation from both sides of the equation.

2. collect terms

3. divide the equation by the coefficient of the variable

4. add the opposite of the constant

___

4. The most negative variable term is -9x, which is on the left side. Subtracting (24-9x) from both sides of the equation, we have ...

0 = -3x -24 +9x

0 = -24 +6x

0 = -4 +x . . . . . divide by 6

4 = x . . . . . . . . add the opposite of -4

__

5. The smallest variable term is 18x, on the right. (The variable term on the left is 20x.)

4(5x +2) +11 -18x -3 = 0 . . . subtract the right side

2x +16 = 0 . . . collect terms

x +8 = 0 . . . . . . divide by 2

x = -8 . . . . . . . . add -8

__

6. All variables are on the left side, so we can just collect terms and divide by the coefficient of the variable.

-5x = -40 . . . collect terms

x = 8 . . . . . divide by -5

If you were to literally follow the steps above, you would recognize that -5x is less than 0x (the x-term on the right side of the equation), so you would subtract the left side, giving ...

0 = 5x -40

0 = x -8 . . . . . divide by 5

8 = x . . . . . . . . add 8

_____

Comment on this solution technique

You will often be told to solve these equations by separating the variable terms from the constant terms. This method actually puts the variable terms and constant terms together (and zero on the other side of the equal sign). The constant is separated from the variable as the last step of this solution process, rather than as one of the first steps. By doing this, we don't have to worry about which variable term or which constant term we're going to mess with.

The only reason for choosing the variable term with the smallest (least) coefficient in the first step is to ensure that the resulting variable coefficient is positive. This tends to reduce errors later on. You can also use that same strategy when solving the equation following the "separate constant terms and variable terms" approach.

Nevaeh took out a 20-year loan for $155,000 at 3.6% interest, compounded monthly. If her monthly payment on the loan is $906.93, how much of her first payment went toward note reduction?A. $441.93

B. $465.00

C. $906.93

D. $326.49

Answers

Answer:

A. $441.93

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that Nevaeh took out a 20-year loan for $155,000 at 3.6% interest, compounded monthly and  her monthly payment on the loan is $906.93

Let us calculate EMI schedule for 155000 for 20 years

Out of EMI 906.93, 441.93 will be for note reduction.

There are four options given as

A. $441.93

B. $465.00

C. $906.93

D. $326.49

Correct answer is option A) 441.93$

suzi starts her hike at a elevation if -225 below sea level. When she reaches the end of the hike, she is still nelow sea level at -127 feet. What was the vhange in elevation from the beginning of Suzi's hike to the end of the hike?

Answers

The change is elevation is 98 feet.

There are a couple different ways to get this answer. You could:
A. Subtract 127 from (positive) 225, to get the height difference. Or...
B. Subtract the starting height from the ending height (-127 - (-225)) which would also give you the height difference.

I hope this helps!

Determine the level of measurement of the variable. an officer's rank in the military Group of answer choices

Answers

Answer:

Ordinal

Step-by-step explanation:

Level of measurement used in statistics summarizes what statistical analysis that is possible. There exist three types of level of measurement. The nominal, ordinal and Interval/Ratio level of measurement. Here, our primary focus will be the Ordinal level of measurement.

Ordinal level of measurement indicates the position in a sequence. In the military sector, the officer's rank is said to be Ordinal. This implies that the ordinal level of measurement categorizes variables according to hierarchy or ranks with a meaningful order. Still, the intervals and differences between the variables may not be equal.

Final answer:

The level of measurement for an officer's rank in the military, is classified as ordinal because there's a distinct order but not a measurable difference between ranks.

Explanation:

The level of measurement for an officer's rank in the military is ordinal. This is because it contains a set order or ranking, without a measurable difference between each rank. For instance, a Colonel is above a Captain, but there's no defined 'numeric difference' you can attribute between the two ranks since it's not a sequence of numbers. This is distinct from levels like interval or ratio, where a specific measurable difference could be discerned between the ranks.

Learn more about Level of Measurement here:

brainly.com/question/33439799

#SPJ3

Zinfandel is a popular red wine varietal produced almost exclusively in California. It is rather controversial among wine connoisseurs because its alcohol content varies quite substantially from one producer to another. In May 2013, the author went to a certain website, randomly selected 10 zinfandels from among the 325 available, and obtained the following values of alcohol content (%). 14.9 14.5 16.2 14.3 15.9
13.7 16.2 14.6 13.9 15.1
A. Calculate the interpret several measures of center.
B. Calculate the sample variance using the defining formula.

Answers

Answer:

Kindly check explanation

B) 0.829

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data :

% Alcohol content of 10 zindafel wine

14.9 14.5 16.2 14.3 15.9

13.7 16.2 14.6 13.9 15.1

Sorted value : 13.7, 13.9, 14.3, 14.5, 14.6, 14.9, 15.1, 15.9, 16.2, 16.2

Range = maximum - minimum

Range = 16.1 - 13.7

n = number of samples = 10

Median = 1/4(n + 1)th term

Median = 1/4(10+1)th term = 11/4 = 2.75 th term

(14.3 + 14.5) / 2 = 28.8 /2 = 14.40

Mode = 16. 2 ( most occurring observation)

Mean(m) = (13.7 + 13.9 + 14.3 + 14.5 + 14.6 + 14.9 + 15.1 + 15.9 + 16.2 + 16.2) / 10

= 149.3 / 10

= 14.93

Please help!!! Will mark brainliest!!!!!!!! Dan wants to determine the probability that the republican on the ballot will be elected mayor of his town. He surveys a random sample of 25 people in the town who are registered to vote. Based on this data, the republican on the ballot has a 36% probability of being elected. Dan now wants to gauge the variation in predictions, to determine how accurate this probability may be. Which if the following would be the best method for him to do this?A) Ask the same 25 people he originally surveyed to make sure they are convinced of their choices


B) Survey several more random samples of 25 people each from people in the town who are registered to vote



C) Survey serveral more random samples of 25 people each from the Republican voters in town


D) Survey a random sample of 25 people who are registered to vote in another town

Answers

so the answer is C because 25 people each from republican.