Answer:
Separation and independence from Spain
Explanation:
The goal of the Latin American revolutions was precisely to gain independence from Spain.
This goal was achieved for all Latin American countries except for Cuba and Puerto Rico.
In South America, Simon Bolívar and San Martín liberated a share of countries, while independence for Mexico (New Spain) and Perú was more difficult because both countries were the most important Spanish colonies of the time.
Historian B: The American Revolution was completely justified due to Great Britain’s repeated abuse of the colonists. The British passed enormous taxes on goods in the colonies, even though the Americans had no say in the British government. British soldiers were also allowed to live in American houses and eat common people’s food without paying. During the Boston Massacre, British soldiers even fired their muskets into a crowd of civilians! Under such oppressive conditions, it’s no wonder that the patriotic colonists would want to fight for the freedom and liberty of all people!
A. Historian B is biased in favor of the British and only includes information that supports them.
B. Historian B tries to establish that high British taxes forced the colonists to commit acts of violence.
C. Historian A makes the claim that the Boston Massacre was made up by lying American colonists.
D. Historian A does not want to mention any events that might make the British look cruel or aggressive.
Answer:
D. Historian A does not want to mention any events that might make the British look cruel or aggressive.
Explanation:
Historian B mentions the Boston Massacre to highlight British abuses, while Historian A seeks to blame the American colonists for their desire for wealth and power, thus avoiding events that portray the British negatively.
The primary reason that Historian B mentions the Boston Massacre while Historian A does not is because their narratives of the American Revolution are guided by differing perspectives. Historian B seeks to highlight the abuses committed by the British against the American colonists, using the Boston Massacre as a clear example of such abuses. On the other hand, Historian A seems to aim at painting the American colonists in a negative light, blaming them for their desire for wealth and power. Therefore, the mention of the Boston Massacre, which portrays the British in a negative light, does not align with Historian A's narrative. Thus, the most accurate response is option D: Historian A does not want to mention any events that might make the British look cruel or aggressive.
#SPJ5
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Answer:
Austria feared increasing rebellion among its subjects.
Explanation:
Well, the most important effect of nationalism in Europe in 1900s was the World Wars. Citizens of many countries were unhappy with the economy and the way things were in their states. This, along to the critical approach towards other nations and the growing national socialism led to the outbreak of military conflicts, pogroms, and eventually the holocaust and facism during the World War II.
Blaborers and farmers
C. blacksmiths and lawyers
D. lawyers and farmers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation: